IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jns/jbstat/v220y2000i3p358-370.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Der Aufstieg und Niedergang der „Modernen“ Wachstumstheorie. Eine quantitative Studie

Author

Listed:
  • Holub Hans Werner

    (Universität Innsbruck, Institut für Wirtschaftstheorie, Wirtschaftspolitik und Wirtschaftsgeschichte, Universitätsstraße 15, A-6020 Innsbruck)

  • Eberharter Veronika

    (Universität Innsbruck, Institut für Wirtschaftstheorie, Wirtschaftspolitik und Wirtschaftsgeschichte, Universitätsstraße 15, A-6020 Innsbruck)

  • Tappeiner Gottfried

    (Universität Innsbruck, Institut für Wirtschaftstheorie, Wirtschaftspolitik und Wirtschaftsgeschichte, Universitätsstraße 15, A-6020 Innsbruck)

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Holub Hans Werner & Eberharter Veronika & Tappeiner Gottfried, 2000. "Der Aufstieg und Niedergang der „Modernen“ Wachstumstheorie. Eine quantitative Studie," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 220(3), pages 358-370, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:jns:jbstat:v:220:y:2000:i:3:p:358-370
    DOI: 10.1515/jbnst-2000-0309
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/jbnst-2000-0309
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/jbnst-2000-0309?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Britto, Ronald, 1973. "Some Recent Developments in the Theory of Economic Growth: An Interpretation," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 11(4), pages 1343-1366, December.
    2. Cox, Raymond A K & Chung, Kee H, 1991. "Patterns of Research Output and Author Concentration in the Economics Literature," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 73(4), pages 740-747, November.
    3. Ronald Britto, 1973. "Some Recent Developments in the Theory of Economic Growth," UCLA Economics Working Papers 038, UCLA Department of Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mario, Pomini, 2009. "From stability to growth in neoclassical multisector models," MPRA Paper 18995, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Arup Maharatna, 2008. "Development of What? An Exposition of the Politics of Development Economics," Working Papers id:1819, eSocialSciences.
    3. Matheus Assaf & Pedro Garcia Duarte, 2018. "Utility Matters: Edmond Malinvaud and growth theory in the 1950s and 1960s," Working Papers, Department of Economics 2018_03, University of São Paulo (FEA-USP).
    4. Ruttan, Vernon W., 1998. "Growth Economics And Development Economics: What Should Development Economists Learn (If Anything) From The New Growth Theory?," Bulletins 12972, University of Minnesota, Economic Development Center.
    5. Pasquale M. Sgro & Akira Takayama, 1981. "On the Long‐Run Growth Effects of a Minimum Wage for a Two‐Sector Economy," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 57(2), pages 180-185, June.
    6. Currie, Russell R. & Pandher, Gurupdesh S., 2011. "Finance journal rankings and tiers: An Active Scholar Assessment methodology," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 7-20, January.
    7. Andrew Balthrop, 2016. "Power laws in oil and natural gas production," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 51(4), pages 1521-1539, December.
    8. Simon Ek & Magnus Henrekson, 2019. "The Geography and Concentration of Authorship in the Top Five: Implications For European Economics," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 66(2), pages 215-245, May.
    9. Krishna Muniyoor, 2022. "The Structure of Scholarly Publishing: a Case of Economics Research in India," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(3), pages 1801-1818, September.
    10. W. Jack Duncan & Eric W. Ford & Matthew D. Rousculp & Peter M. Ginter, 2002. "Community of scholars: An exploratory study of management laureates," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 55(3), pages 395-409, November.
    11. Nir Jaimovich & Sergio Rebelo, 2017. "Nonlinear Effects of Taxation on Growth," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 125(1), pages 265-291.
    12. Kam C. Chan & Carl R. Chen & Louis T. W. Cheng, 2007. "Global ranking of accounting programmes and the elite effect in accounting research," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 47(2), pages 187-220, June.
    13. Nicolas CARAYOL & Agenor LAHATTE, 2009. "Dominance relations and universities ranking," Cahiers du GREThA (2007-2019) 2009-02, Groupe de Recherche en Economie Théorique et Appliquée (GREThA).
    14. Amara, Nabil & Rhaiem, Mehdi & Halilem, Norrin, 2020. "Assessing the research efficiency of Canadian scholars in the management field: Evidence from the DEA and fsQCA," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 296-306.
    15. Lubrano, Michel & Protopopescu, Camelia, 2004. "Density inference for ranking European research systems in the field of economics," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 123(2), pages 345-369, December.
    16. Ho Fai Chan & Benno Torgler, 2013. "The Implications of Educational and Methodological Background for The Career Success of Nobel Laureates: Looking at Major Awards," CREMA Working Paper Series 2013-13, Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA).
    17. Paul Gopuran Devassy Bino & Sasidharan Subash & Ananthakrishnan Ramanathan, 2005. "Concentration in Knowledge Output: A case of Economics Journals," European Journal of Comparative Economics, Cattaneo University (LIUC), vol. 2(2), pages 261-279, December.
    18. Glötzl, Florentin & Aigner, Ernest, 2017. "Six Dimensions of Concentration in Economics: Scientometric Evidence from a Large-Scale Data Set," Ecological Economic Papers 15, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    19. Rose M. Rubin & Cyril F. Chang, 2003. "A bibliometric analysis of health economics articles in the economics literature: 1991‐2000," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 12(5), pages 403-414, May.
    20. Hendrik P. Van Dalen & Kène Henkens, 2001. "What makes a scientific article influential? The case of demographers," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 50(3), pages 455-482, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jns:jbstat:v:220:y:2000:i:3:p:358-370. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.