IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jis/ejistu/y2021i01id469.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Euro-Atlantic Divergences and the Economic Impact of the Iranian Nuclear Issue

Author

Listed:
  • TOPLICEANU Ștefan Cătălin

Abstract

The United States and the Europe have been coordinated each other several times, especially after World War II. But, there have been some divergences between them in recent years, especially in economic terms. The American and the European views are different regarding a series of world economy issues, including bilateral trade relations, the attitude towards China, Russia and their influences, military defence, energy supply, but also about the Iranian influence in the Middle East. This paper aims to analyze the Euro-Atlantic divergences from the Iranian nuclear issue perspective, in order to study the economic impact on the economies involved. The different views regarding this issue determine different economic effects; the most affected being the Iranian economy, even if the European Union tried to reduce the consequences of the American withdraw from the Iranian nuclear deal. The new American paradigm, determined by the Trump administration, is looking to increase the United States influence over the world economy and to eliminate the poor trade relations, which caused numerous trade deficits. From the Iranian nuclear issue the most advantaged economy is the Chinese one, whose trade relations with Iran increased, while the American withdraw seems to be a good choice for the United States economy, generating trade benefits.

Suggested Citation

  • TOPLICEANU Ștefan Cătălin, 2021. "The Euro-Atlantic Divergences and the Economic Impact of the Iranian Nuclear Issue," European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Bucharest Economic Academy, issue 01, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:jis:ejistu:y:2021:i:01:id:469
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ejist.ro/files/pdf/469.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ejist.ro/abstract/469/The-Euro-Atlantic-Divergences-and-the-Economic-Impact-of-the-Iranian-Nuclear.html
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adam Tarock, 2016. "The Iran nuclear deal: winning a little, losing a lot," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(8), pages 1408-1424, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Behrooz Shahmoradi & Reza Hafezi & Payam Chiniforooshan, 2024. "Industrial Development Policies Based on Economic Complexity Under Plausible Scenarios: Case of Iran 2027," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(2), pages 6578-6603, June.
    2. Radosław FIEDLER, 2018. "Iran and the European Union after the Nuclear Deal," CES Working Papers, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 10(3), pages 291-305, November.
    3. Sima Baidya, 2017. "India’s Policy towards Iran," International Studies, , vol. 54(1-4), pages 144-161, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    world economic powers; EU influence; US supremacy; US-China competition;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F02 - International Economics - - General - - - International Economic Order and Integration
    • F31 - International Economics - - International Finance - - - Foreign Exchange
    • F51 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - International Conflicts; Negotiations; Sanctions
    • F53 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - International Agreements and Observance; International Organizations
    • O50 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economywide Country Studies - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jis:ejistu:y:2021:i:01:id:469. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alina Popescu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/frasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.