IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jfr/jms111/v7y2016i1p81-89.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Corporate Culture Differences between Taiwan and Vietnam

Author

Listed:
  • Massoud Moslehpour
  • Van Kien Pham
  • Ismail Bilgicli
  • Huynh Van Nguyen

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate and compare corporate culture differences between Taiwan and Vietnam. The concept of corporate culture is adopted from Trompenaars and Turner¡¯s four types of corporate culture. Trompenaars and Turner (2012) categorized corporate culture into four main types: the Family, the Eiffel Tower, the Guided Missile and the Incubator. The ANOVA approach is employed to describe and analyze the collected data. A total of 477 employees from public and private corporate sectors in Taiwan and Vietnam participated in this study. Out of 477 respondents 246 are Taiwanese and 231 are Vietnamese. The competing value framework (CVF) (Cameron & Quinn, 2006) is the main reference for developing the questionnaire. The results of the study show that there are significant differences in corporate cultures between Taiwan and Vietnam on three out of four aspects of corporate culture introduced in this study.

Suggested Citation

  • Massoud Moslehpour & Van Kien Pham & Ismail Bilgicli & Huynh Van Nguyen, 2016. "Corporate Culture Differences between Taiwan and Vietnam," Journal of Management and Strategy, Journal of Management and Strategy, Sciedu Press, vol. 7(1), pages 81-89, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:jfr:jms111:v:7:y:2016:i:1:p:81-89
    DOI: 10.5430/jms.v7n1p81
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciedu.ca/journal/index.php/jms/article/view/8897/5349
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.sciedu.ca/journal/index.php/jms/article/view/8897
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5430/jms.v7n1p81?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:jms111:v:7:y:2016:i:1:p:81-89. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jenny Zhang (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://jms.sciedupress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.