IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jfr/jms111/v5y2014i1p108-111.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On CSSCI Citation Analysis as Application Prospect of Humanities and Social Sciences Evaluation Method

Author

Listed:
  • Qian Sun
  • Hongwei Sun

Abstract

CSSCI (Chinese Social Sciences Citation Index) has a certain influence and reorganization in Chinese humanities and social sciences, this paper tries to analyze the reasons for the spreading influence and characteristics of CSSCI to explore application prospect of citation analysis. It is pointed out that the CSSCI Citation analysis would be an important and feasible method of academic evaluation of humanities and social sciences. Establishing and improving CSSCI is bound to become an important aspect of constructing China's evaluation system of humanities and social sciences.

Suggested Citation

  • Qian Sun & Hongwei Sun, 2014. "On CSSCI Citation Analysis as Application Prospect of Humanities and Social Sciences Evaluation Method," Journal of Management and Strategy, Journal of Management and Strategy, Sciedu Press, vol. 5(1), pages 108-111, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:jfr:jms111:v:5:y:2014:i:1:p:108-111
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciedu.ca/journal/index.php/jms/article/view/4243/2435
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.sciedu.ca/journal/index.php/jms/article/view/4243
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liang, Wenyan & Gu, Jun & Nyland, Chris, 2022. "China's new research evaluation policy: Evidence from economics faculty of Elite Chinese universities," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(1).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:jms111:v:5:y:2014:i:1:p:108-111. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jenny Zhang (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://jms.sciedupress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.