IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jfr/jbar11/v6y2017i1p1-13.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Learning Style Differences between Undergraduates, MBAs, Nonmanagement Workers, and Managers in Japan

Author

Listed:
  • Yoshitaka Yamazaki
  • Hitoshi Umemura

Abstract

Using Kolb¡¯s experiential learning theory, this study aimed to explore how learning style differed among four cohorts- undergraduate management majors, master¡¯s of business administration (MBA) students, nonmanagement workers, and managers. The research context was Japan, with 1080 participants from two universities, one business school, and two different firms focused on sales and production. To compare the four cohors, this study applied a cross-sectional study. Results indicated that managers showed the strongest preference for active over reflective learning, followed by MBA students, nonmanagement workers, and undergraduates. Managers¡¯ active learning orientation did not statistically differ from that of MBA students, but did statistically differ from the groups of nonmanagement employees and undergraduates. With regard to the learning dimension of thinking versus feeling, MBA students were the most abstract learners, while the other three groups exhibited concrete learning orientations. The present research was the first to empirically compare groups according to career transitions from undergraduates towards management positions. This study provides insight on how individuals differ in learning styles as their careers develop.

Suggested Citation

  • Yoshitaka Yamazaki & Hitoshi Umemura, 2017. "Learning Style Differences between Undergraduates, MBAs, Nonmanagement Workers, and Managers in Japan," Journal of Business Administration Research, Journal of Business Administration Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 6(1), pages 1-13, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:jfr:jbar11:v:6:y:2017:i:1:p:1-13
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/jbar/article/download/10912/7007
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/jbar/article/view/10912
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:jbar11:v:6:y:2017:i:1:p:1-13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Grace Lee (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://jbar.sciedupress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.