IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jfr/afr111/v7y2018i4p184.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Need for Audit Trinity Report to Reinforce Financial Reporting Integrity

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammad K. Shbeilat

Abstract

Investors’ reliability on financial statements decreases due to continuing corporate scandals. Many of these rogue listed companies have had dominant shareholders who have circumvented internal controls for personal gain or have hidden poor management using misleading reporting. This has led to calls for restructuring the annual financial report and to fill the gap of corporate governance constituents. This study aims to highlight the importance of combining the efforts of the audit trinity (those are- the audit committee, the external auditor and the internal auditor) in securing the financial reporting system and corporate governance. This literature-based study suggests coordinating and integrating the efforts of the audit trinity and the issue a joint report addressing all matters related to (1) safeguarding company’s assets and accounts (2) ensuring that financial statements and the annual report are fair, balanced and reliable, and (3) ensure the entity’s compliance with applicable laws, corporate governance code, and accounting and auditing standards. The proposed joint report is to be signed by the audit trinity and certified by the chairperson of the board. The development of this report went through two stages, the first one, reviewing related literature, internationally recognized frameworks and corporate governance best practices, and related international standards on auditing; the second stage was sending the draft of the proposed report to 20 expert referees requesting their comments on the structure and the appropriateness of the proposed report. The proposed report helps by clarifying the communication mechanism, responsibilities and powers of the audit trinity that enable them to adequately discharge their duty of maintaining corporate accountability and securing the financial reporting system. It also addressed the need to have informed and stringent control over the quality of financial ‎reporting and avoidance of conflicts of interest‎.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammad K. Shbeilat, 2018. "The Need for Audit Trinity Report to Reinforce Financial Reporting Integrity," Accounting and Finance Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 7(4), pages 184-184, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:jfr:afr111:v:7:y:2018:i:4:p:184
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/afr/article/download/14499/8919
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/afr/article/view/14499
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bajra, Ujkan & Čadež, Simon, 2018. "Audit committees and financial reporting quality: The 8th EU Company Law Directive perspective," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 151-163.
    2. Yu (Elli) Zhang & David Hay & Claus Holm, 2016. "Non-audit services and auditor independence: Norwegian evidence," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(1), pages 1215223-121, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qasim Ahmad Alawaqleh & Nashat Ali Almasria, 2021. "The Impact of Audit Committee Performance and Composition on Financial Reporting Quality in Jordan," International Journal of Financial Research, International Journal of Financial Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 12(3), pages 55-69, May.
    2. Claudia Catalina CIOCAN & Mihai CARP & Iuliana GEORGESCU, 2021. "The Determinants of the Financial Reporting Quality: Empirical Evidence for Romania," The Audit Financiar journal, Chamber of Financial Auditors of Romania, vol. 19(162), pages 301-301, May.
    3. Baumöhl, Eduard & Iwasaki, Ichiro & Kočenda, Evžen, 2019. "Institutions and determinants of firm survival in European emerging markets," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 431-453.
    4. Kusharyanti Kusharyanti & Indra Wijaya Kusuma, 2020. "Overconfident Management and the Audit Fee Demand-Side Perspective," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 10(10), pages 1131-1146, October.
    5. Ayesha Hameed & Mazhar Ali Alyani & Muhammad Sijawal Alyani & Ghulam Hussain & Abdul Manan Channa, 2024. "Various Factor Affecting External and Internal Auditor Performance: Analytical Perspectives of Employees Working in Karachi Audit Firm and Companies," Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 13(2), pages 848-856.
    6. Hussein Khasharmeh & Abdelmohsen M. Desoky, 2018. "Does the Provision of Non-audit Services Affect Auditor Independence and Audit Quality? Evidence from Bahrain," Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance (AAMJAF), Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia, vol. 14(1), pages 25-55.
    7. Rogoz Marius-Eugen & Stoica Dragoș-Andrei, 2021. "Compliance with the provisions of the Corporate Governance Code by companies listed on the Romanian capital market with respect to the formation and functioning of audit committees," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 15(1), pages 737-748, December.
    8. Ionica Oncioiu & Anca-Gabriela Petrescu & Florentina-Raluca Bîlcan & Marius Petrescu & Melinda Timea Fülöp & Dan Ioan Topor, 2020. "The Influence of Corporate Governance Systems on a Company’s Market Value," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-15, April.
    9. Marius Eugen Rogoz & Dragos Andrei Stoica & George-Aurelian Tudor, 2022. "Corporate Governance In The Setting Up And Operation The Audit Committees Of Bse Listed Companies," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 2, pages 18-31, April.
    10. Xinmin Liu & Kangkang Lin & Lei Wang & Hongkun Zhang, 2021. "Stochastic Evolutionary Game Analysis Between Special Committees and CEO: Incentive and Supervision," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 11(3), pages 538-555, September.
    11. Ovidiu-Constantin Bunget & Dorel Mateș & Alin-Constantin Dumitrescu & Oana Bogdan & Valentin Burcă, 2020. "The Link between Board Structure, Audit, and Performance for Corporate Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-27, October.
    12. Ming Li & Anning Tian & Shuyi Li & Xiaoyu Qi, 2018. "Evaluating the Quality of Enterprise Environmental Accounting Information Disclosure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-15, June.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:afr111:v:7:y:2018:i:4:p:184. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sciedu Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.