IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jfr/afr111/v7y2018i1p25.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quality Management Mechanism, Job Satisfaction and Performance Audit

Author

Listed:
  • Kuang-Hua Wang
  • Wun-Hong Su

Abstract

This paper extends the literature evaluating the relation between the quality management mechanism implementation of Taiwanese government audit and the job satisfaction of government auditors for the government auditors’ identification of the influential factors to improve performance audit. The questionnaire survey was employed in this study. A total of 613 questionnaires were sent and 535 valid responses were collected. The return rate is 87.28%. The empirical results demonstrate that most government auditors fulfill the governmental policies and are satisfied with the current job condition after the senior executives strive to establish the auditing quality management mechanism. The influential factors of performance audit enhancement for government auditors appear significance.

Suggested Citation

  • Kuang-Hua Wang & Wun-Hong Su, 2018. "Quality Management Mechanism, Job Satisfaction and Performance Audit," Accounting and Finance Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 7(1), pages 1-25, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:jfr:afr111:v:7:y:2018:i:1:p:25
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/afr/article/download/12463/7694
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/afr/article/view/12463
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ho-Young Lee & Hyun-Young Park, 2016. "Characteristics of the internal audit and external audit hours: evidence from S. Korea," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 31(6/7), pages 629-654, June.
    2. Rick Stephan Hayes & Richard Baker, 2014. "A participant observation study of the resolution of audit engagement challenges in government tax compliance audits," Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 11(4), pages 416-439, November.
    3. Veena L. Brown & Jodi L. Gissel & Daniel Gordon Neely, 2016. "Audit quality indicators: perceptions of junior-level auditors," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 31(8/9), pages 949-980, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. José-Joaquín del-Pozo-Antúnez & Horacio Molina-Sánchez & Francisco Fernández-Navarro & Antonio Ariza-Montes, 2021. "Accountancy as a Meaningful Work. Main Determinants from a Job Quality and Optimization Algorithm Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-14, August.
    2. Krishantoro Krishantoro & Renisya Ayu & Sri Susanti & Yurisman Star, 2022. "Increasing Public Awareness in Compliance with Paying Vehicle Taxes through Behavioural Change Communication: A Case Study in Bekasi City," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 30(1), pages 282-291, April.
    3. Rajat Deb, 2018. "Financial Audit or Forensic Audit? Government Sector Panorama," Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, , vol. 11(2), pages 135-158, December.
    4. Hendra Susanto & Sri Mulyani & Citra Sukmadilaga & Erlane K. Ghani, 2022. "Sustaining Investigative Audit Quality through Auditor Competency and Digital Forensic Support: A Consensus Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-24, November.
    5. Wonder Agbenyo & Yuansheng Jiang & Prince Komla Cobblah, 2018. "Assessment of Government Internal Control Systems on Financial Reporting Quality in Ghana: A Case Study of Ghana Revenue Authority," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(11), pages 1-40, November.
    6. George Drogalas & Michail Nerantzidis & Margaritis Samaras & Michail Pazarskis, 2020. "Audit committee and factors that affect its characteristics: the case of Greece," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 17(4), pages 181-194, December.
    7. El’fred Boo & Terence Ng & Premila Gowri Shankar, 2021. "Effects of Advice on Auditor Whistleblowing Propensity: Do Advice Source and Advisor Reassurance Matter?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 174(2), pages 387-402, November.
    8. Prastika Suwandi Tjeng & Rina Nopianti, 2021. "The Effect of Auditor's Technical Abilities on the Quality of Financial Statement Information," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(6), pages 129-129, June.
    9. Rajat Deb & Pallad Debnath & Ananda Mohan Pal, 2021. "Expectation Gap Analysis in Corporate Financial Reporting Practices in India," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 46(1), pages 38-58, February.
    10. Rajat Deb & Joydeep Das, 2018. "IFRSs Convergence and Expectation Gap: Vindication from Practitioners," Metamorphosis: A Journal of Management Research, , vol. 17(2), pages 86-99, December.
    11. Ionela-Corina CHERSAN, 2019. "Audit Quality and Several of Its Determinants," The Audit Financiar journal, Chamber of Financial Auditors of Romania, vol. 17(153), pages 1-93.
    12. Konstantinos Petridis & Georgios Drogalas & Eleni Zografidou, 2021. "Internal auditor selection using a TOPSIS/non-linear programming model," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 296(1), pages 513-539, January.
    13. Haapamäki, Elina & Sihvonen, Jukka, 2019. "Research on International Standards on Auditing: Literature synthesis and opportunities for future research," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 37-56.
    14. Harris, M. Kathleen & Williams, L. Tyler, 2020. "Audit quality indicators: Perspectives from Non-Big Four audit firms and small company audit committees," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    15. Sergiu SOIMU & Svetlana MIHAILA & Galina BADICU, 2022. "Audit Professional Competence Requirements," European Journal of Accounting, Finance & Business, "Stefan cel Mare" University of Suceava, Romania - Faculty of Economics and Public Administration, West University of Timisoara, Romania - Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 10(1), pages 126-134, February.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:afr111:v:7:y:2018:i:1:p:25. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sciedu Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.