IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jfr/afr111/v5y2016i2p42.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Auditing of Subsequent Events: A Survey of Auditors in the City of Istanbul in Turkey

Author

Listed:
  • Zehra Ozdemir
  • Basak Ataman Gokcen

Abstract

Unlimited numbers of events which can occur after the reporting period, but before board approval of financial statements (subsequent events), can have important effects on financial statements, independent audit opinion, investors and other related parties with the financial reporting system. The Capital Market Boards have shortened the time between the balance sheet date and report release date, thus potential subsequent events may affect the entire audit process. This reduction narrowed the legally allowed period of the preparation of financial statements. Moreover, the reduction limited the processes of obtaining, searching and evaluating evidence of subsequent events, since the majority of the audit work will be performed after the balance sheet date. The aim of this paper is to examine subsequent event audit experiences and the process of searching for evidence, and to measure the importance level of disclosures, perception level and use of Turkish Independent Auditing Standard 560.Â

Suggested Citation

  • Zehra Ozdemir & Basak Ataman Gokcen, 2016. "Auditing of Subsequent Events: A Survey of Auditors in the City of Istanbul in Turkey," Accounting and Finance Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 5(2), pages 1-42, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:jfr:afr111:v:5:y:2016:i:2:p:42
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/afr/article/download/9277/5641
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/afr/article/view/9277
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Muthupandian, K S, 2008. "IAS 10 Events After the Reporting Period - A Closer Look," MPRA Paper 36783, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Uyar, Ali & Güngörmüş, Ali Haydar, 2013. "Perceptions and knowledge of accounting professionals on IFRS for SMEs: Evidence from Turkey," Research in Accounting Regulation, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 77-87.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nurunnabi, Mohammad, 2018. "Perceived costs and benefits of IFRS adoption in Saudi Arabia: An exploratory study," Research in Accounting Regulation, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 166-175.
    2. Bonito, Ana & Pais, Cláudio, 2018. "The macroeconomic determinants of the adoption of IFRS for SMEs," Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 116-127.
    3. Paula Gomes dos Santos & Fábio Albuquerque & Maria Albertina Barreiro Rodrigues & Ana Isabel Morais, 2022. "The Views of Stakeholders on Mandatory or Voluntary Use of a Simplified Standard on Non-Financial Information for SMEs in the European Union," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-22, February.
    4. Pr. Benhayoun Issam & Pr. Zejjari Ibtissam, 2023. "Determinants of IFRS for SMES Adoption Worldwide [Les déterminants de l'adoption de l'IFRS pour PMEs au monde]," Post-Print hal-04209334, HAL.
    5. Hedi Baazaoui, 2020. "For A New Method Of Calculating The Disclosure Index," Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting, Uniwersytet Mikolaja Kopernika, vol. 9(2), pages 9-24.
    6. Ngoc Thi Bui & Oanh Thi Tu Le & Huy Manh Dao, 2020. "Estimation of Benefits and Difficulties When Applying IFRS in Vietnam: From Business Perspective," International Journal of Financial Research, International Journal of Financial Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 11(4), pages 165-179, July.
    7. Abbas Saad Hamada Alkhuzaie & Muzaffar Asad & Ala'a Zuhair Ahmad Mansour & Mohammed Ali Bait Ali Sulaiman & Umar Nawaz Kayani & Muhammad Uzair Asif, 2024. "Compliance with Accounting Standards by Jordanian SMEs," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 1, pages 89-107.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:afr111:v:5:y:2016:i:2:p:42. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sciedu Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.