IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jfr/afr111/v3y2014i4p166.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Test of Proportions Screening for the Newcomb-Benford Screen in the Audit Context: A Likelihood Triaging Protocol

Author

Listed:
  • Edward J. Lusk
  • Michael Halperin

Abstract

The basis of the certification audit, in a non-forensic context, is a random sample of sufficient size to create the evidence needed to justify the audit opinion. This has been clearly stated in all of the relevant SAS pronouncements issued by the AICPA and also by the PCAOB through AS 5. However, there has been a dearth of specifics on the critical selection of the set of accounts that are reasonable targets for the statistical sampling needed if extended audit procedures seem warranted. In this paper, we present a simple and validated protocol based upon the digital frequency testing introduced by Newcomb & Benford and popularized in the audit context by Nigrini to identify accounts under audit that seem reasonable candidates for extended procedures testing. The montage of the protocol centers around the parametric test of proportions the equations which were introduced by Nigrini. We validated the logic of the protocol by using a holdback sample. Finally, we have coded the account identification protocol as a Decision Support System in VBA- ExcelÔ that is available from the authors free without restriction to its use.

Suggested Citation

  • Edward J. Lusk & Michael Halperin, 2014. "Test of Proportions Screening for the Newcomb-Benford Screen in the Audit Context: A Likelihood Triaging Protocol," Accounting and Finance Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 3(4), pages 166-166, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:jfr:afr111:v:3:y:2014:i:4:p:166
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/afr/article/download/5868/3501
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/afr/article/view/5868
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:afr111:v:3:y:2014:i:4:p:166. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sciedu Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.