IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jes/wpaper/y2020v12i4p298-321.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Paradoxes of expert approaches to the study of cultural infrastructure: the Ukrainian case

Author

Listed:
  • Svitlana OVCHARENKO

    (Doctor of Science, Full Professor at Odesa Regional Institute for Public Administration of the National Academy for Public Administration under the President of Ukraine, Odesa, Ukraine)

Abstract

The article reveals the imperfection of ways to use existing approaches to the study of the cultural infrastructure in Ukraine, in particular when we apply methods offered by the UN and the EU as well. The research evidences that both foreign and Ukrainian experts are taking the first steps to ascertain the condition of cultural infrastructure in Ukraine and currently there is no objective complete database. Positive characteristics of different ways of measuring the state of cultural infrastructure are proposed to unite and Ukraine should be considered as the base country for testing scientific research methods, which will facilitate the establishment of scientific cooperation in the field of cultural policy and the coordination of joint decisions for cross-border partnership. One of the additional important parameters for the study of cultural infrastructure is its relevance to the overall political plans for the development of culture in the European community.

Suggested Citation

  • Svitlana OVCHARENKO, 2021. "Paradoxes of expert approaches to the study of cultural infrastructure: the Ukrainian case," CES Working Papers, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 12(4), pages 298-321, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:jes:wpaper:y:2020:v:12:i:4:p:298-321
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ceswp.uaic.ro/articles/CESWP2020_XII4_OVC.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jes:wpaper:y:2020:v:12:i:4:p:298-321. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alupului Ciprian (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/csjesro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.