IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jes/wpaper/y2012v4i4p758-771.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Outline Of The Europe – South Africa Relations During And Post The Apartheid Era

Author

Listed:
  • Konstantinos Margaritis

    (LLM Tilburg University, Greece)

Abstract

South Africa was always a main interest region for European countries. The United Kingdom, the Netherlands, France and many others at lesser extent, tried to establish control over the country due to its special geographical position. On the other hand, since 1948, South Africa had been characterized by a tremendous regime, the so-called apartheid. The idea of this paper is to clarify the position of certain European countries towards South Africa during this severe period for the latest and to outline the major development agreements between the EC/EU and South Africa after the fall of apartheid, since South Africa is an important trade partner for the Union.

Suggested Citation

  • Konstantinos Margaritis, 2012. "An Outline Of The Europe – South Africa Relations During And Post The Apartheid Era," CES Working Papers, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 4(4), pages 758-771, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:jes:wpaper:y:2012:v:4:i:4:p:758-771
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ceswp.uaic.ro/articles/CESWP2012_IV4_MAR.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dot Keet, 1997. "Europe's free-trade plans with South Africa: Strategic responses from and challenges to South and Southern Africa," Development Southern Africa, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(2), pages 285-293.
    2. Martin Holland, 1987. "Three Approaches for Understanding European Political Co‐operation: A Case‐Study of EC — South African Policy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(4), pages 295-313, June.
    3. Martin Holland, 1995. "Bridging the Capability‐Expectations Gap: A Case Study of the CFSP Joint Action on South Africa," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 555-572, December.
    4. Beinart, William, 2001. "Twentieth-Century South Africa," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, edition 2, number 9780192893185.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:jes:wpaper:y:2012:v:4:p:758-771 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Jan David Bakker & Christopher Parsons & Ferdinand Rauch, 2020. "Migration and Urbanization in Post-Apartheid South Africa," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 34(2), pages 509-532.
    3. Christian B. Jensen & Jonathan Slapin & Thomas König, 2007. "Who Calls for a Common EU Foreign Policy?," European Union Politics, , vol. 8(3), pages 387-410, September.
    4. Neely, Abigail H. & Ponshunmugam, Arunsrinivasan, 2019. "A qualitative approach to examining health care access in rural South Africa," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 230(C), pages 214-221.
    5. Alexia Lochmann, 2022. "Diagnosing Drivers of Spatial Exclusion: Places, People, and Policies in South Africa’s Former Homelands," CID Working Papers 140a, Center for International Development at Harvard University.
    6. Michelle Westermann-Behaylo, 2009. "Institutionalizing Peace through Commerce: Engagement or Divestment in South African and Sudan," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 89(4), pages 417-434, March.
    7. Ömer UÐUR, 2016. "The Europranization of national Foreign Policies: The Examples og germany and France within the Framework of Ukraine Crisis," Turkish Economic Review, KSP Journals, vol. 3(3), pages 527-536, September.
    8. Mnwana, Sonwabile & Bowman, Andrew, 2018. "Mine mechanisation and distributional conflict in rural South Africa," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 227-237.
    9. Michael Noble & Gemma Wright, 2013. "Using Indicators of Multiple Deprivation to Demonstrate the Spatial Legacy of Apartheid in South Africa," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 112(1), pages 187-201, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Apartheid policy; European Union external relations; development policy; South Africa Romania;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F53 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - International Agreements and Observance; International Organizations
    • K33 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - International Law
    • Z18 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Public Policy
    • F54 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - Colonialism; Imperialism; Postcolonialism

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jes:wpaper:y:2012:v:4:i:4:p:758-771. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alupului Ciprian (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/csjesro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.