IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jda/journl/vol.51year2017issue4pp361-395.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Explaining the Ethiopian farmers’ perceptions on potential loss of traditional crop varieties: A principal components regression analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Edilegnaw Wale
  • Karin Holm-Mueller

    (University of KawaZulu-Natal, South Africa
    University of Bonn, Germany)

Abstract

Understanding farmers’ views, knowledge and perceptions regarding the potential loss of traditional varieties is an important input for any on-farm conservation initiative or policy. With almost exclusive focus on scientists’ recommendations, the paper argues that one of the major reasons for past failure of agrobiodiversity policies to result in the level of impact expected is their failure to adequately integrate farmers’ knowledge. With regard to the different views and sometimes results, and given that farmers’ knowledge is the true reflection of the reality on the ground, it remains essential to understand their assessment and perceptions of the causes and consequences of replacement. Characterizing farmers and distinguishing between those who perceive replacement and loss and those who do not can assist in bridging the science-policy gap. Thus, this paper aims to explain farmers’ perceptions of the potential loss of traditional varieties of crops. As part of a bigger project, called the Genetic Resources Policy Initiative, data for this paper was elicited from 395 farm households in Northern Ethiopia in 2007. The survey did not focus on a specific crop variety, as the purpose of the study was to broadly elicit farmers’ general perceptions for traditional varieties of crops in the study areas. The data was analyzed by using a principal components analysis followed by the Poisson regression analysis. The findings suggest that replacement and loss lead to the disappearance of traditional varieties which, in turn, affects farmers’ livelihoods. This happens mainly because traditional varieties lose their desirable traits and soils increasingly become less suited to these varieties. Prosperous farmers earn most of their income from crop production and are less dependent on traditional varieties. Unlike them, resource-poor farmers’ livelihoods are more dependent on a portfolio of traditional varieties, and they are therefore more interested in, concerned with and informed about the replacement. Rather than what farmers do themselves, their perceptions are shaped by observing others, their dependence on traditional varieties, their concern, and the information they receive. To avoid trade-offs and take advantage of the synergies between crop productivity and crop diversity, mitigation measures will remain indispensable in terms of linking agricultural extension services with on-farm conservation initiatives. Measures could include the development of on-farm conservation partnership with farmers who acknowledge the causes and consequences (to their livelihoods) of the replacement.

Suggested Citation

  • Edilegnaw Wale & Karin Holm-Mueller, 2017. "Explaining the Ethiopian farmers’ perceptions on potential loss of traditional crop varieties: A principal components regression analysis," Journal of Developing Areas, Tennessee State University, College of Business, vol. 51(4), pages 361-395, October-D.
  • Handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.51:year:2017:issue4:pp:361-395
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://muse.jhu.edu/article/662849
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    farmers’ perceptions; traditional variety replacement; principal components regression; Ethiopia;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • B23 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought since 1925 - - - Econometrics; Quantitative and Mathematical Studies
    • J43 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Particular Labor Markets - - - Agricultural Labor Markets
    • Q13 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Markets and Marketing; Cooperatives; Agribusiness

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.51:year:2017:issue4:pp:361-395. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Abu N.M. Wahid (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cbtnsus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.