IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jda/journl/vol.51year2017issue3pp425-435.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The labyrinth of international governance codes: The quest for harmonization

Author

Listed:
  • Erin Poulton
  • Lisa Barnes
  • Frank Clarke

    (University of Newcastle, Australia)

Abstract

The background to this research is based on the considerable debate as to whether there will ever be one international currency, one "business" language spoken or one set of accounting standards applicable to all businesses listed in various countries stock exchanges. Governance principles are no different! Is it possible to create one set of rules or principles to guide all businesses across borders? This research compares the governance standards and regimes across the globe, from China, to the Nordic region (Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Iceland & Finland), Europe, Asia-Pacific (New Zealand, Australia) and the United States of America. Using archival data, governance codes from around the world are compared and contrasted. The findings show that across borders governance codes are very similar, with the opportunity to create a Global Governance Standard (GGS), applicable to any business in any country. The Global Governance Standard (GGS) is a one-size-fits-all regime applicable to businesses listing on stock exchanges. The GGS is not unlike the harmonisation of accounting standards. The "one-size-fits-all" GGS could potentially apply to any large business, listed on any stock exchange, creating efficiencies and ease of comparison for potential stakeholders interested in businesses. The "BOARDSS" model can be used by listed companies, in order to satisfy corporate governance codes from across the globe. B oard: to ensure the board are selected carefully. O pen: The make sure that the board is transparent and accountable. A uditor Independence: ensure accounts are audited by an independent auditor. R emuneration: the CEO and executive staff are reviewed, and supported by a smaller remuneration committee. D irectors are selected for their ability to "add-value" to the strategic direction of the company, and the support of the CEO. Directors' performance should be reviewed annually. Reducing the labyrinth of governance codes to just one GGS would create a uniform approach to governance, supported by government and stock exchanges around the world. A GGS would be the final evolution in the notion of governance since the codes of conduct of Hammurabi of 1800 BC. Let the borders be gone, and the Global Governance Standard (GGS) left standing as the final chapter in governance evolution.

Suggested Citation

  • Erin Poulton & Lisa Barnes & Frank Clarke, 2017. "The labyrinth of international governance codes: The quest for harmonization," Journal of Developing Areas, Tennessee State University, College of Business, vol. 51(3), pages 425-435, July-Sept.
  • Handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.51:year:2017:issue3:pp:425-435
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://muse.jhu.edu/article/662362
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Global Governance Standards; BOARDSS model; Corporate Governance.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G38 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • M16 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - International Business Administration
    • O16 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Financial Markets; Saving and Capital Investment; Corporate Finance and Governance

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.51:year:2017:issue3:pp:425-435. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Abu N.M. Wahid (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cbtnsus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.