IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jda/journl/vol.50year2016issue4pp81-95.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Financial Development And Economic Growth: Evidence From Southern African Development Community Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Ariuna Taivan
  • Gibson Nene

    (University of Minnesota Duluth, USA)

Abstract

This paper examines causality between financial development and economic growth for 10 Southern African Development Community (SADC) countries for the period 1994 to 2013. We employed the vector autoregression (VAR) approach to conduct Granger causality tests to determine the direction of causality relationship between financial development and economic growth. Before conducting Granger causality tests, we performed the following prerequisite tests: unit root tests to test for data stationarity, and cointegration tests to examine short-and long-run relationships between financial development and economic growth. Our results provide evidence of two of the three main views on the link between financial development and economic growth: the supply leading theory (financial development causes economic growth or positive causality); and the demand following response (economic growth causes financial development or reverse causality). Specifically, our empirical results suggest that when broad money (BM) and direct credit (DC) are used as measures of financial development, there is evidence of the demand following response for 50% and 60% of the sample, respectively. Results also showed that financial development caused economic growth in 20% and 30% of the sample when BM and DC are used to measure financial development, respectively. No evidence of causality was recorded for 30% and 10% of the countries when BM and DC were used to measure financial development, respectively. In light of the dominance of reverse causality and the presence of no causality for some countries, we conclude that financial liberalization failed to increase economic growth for 80% and 70% of the sample when broad money and domestic credit were used to measure financial development, respectively. The differences in the direction of causality across SADC countries could be due to a wide variation in the policies governing the financial sector, colonial origin and other institutional factors which shape the laws governing how banks and other financial institutions operate in different countries. Our findings suggest different policy routes for countries within the SADC region with regard to how they can grow their economies. Specifically, countries for which the reverse causality result holds should direct more resources towards stimulating economic growth through channels other than financial development in order to develop their financial sectors. On the other hand, we recommend that countries for which the financial development leading to economic growth result holds should channel more of their resources towards growing their financial sectors in order to drive economic growth.

Suggested Citation

  • Ariuna Taivan & Gibson Nene, 2016. "Financial Development And Economic Growth: Evidence From Southern African Development Community Countries," Journal of Developing Areas, Tennessee State University, College of Business, vol. 50(4), pages 81-95, October-D.
  • Handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.50:year:2016:issue4:pp:81-95
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://muse.jhu.edu/article/639388
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Neil A. Wilmot & Ariuna Taivan, 2021. "Examining the Impact of Financial Development on Energy Production in Emerging Economies," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-17, February.
    2. Amar Anwar & Ichiro Iwasaki, 2023. "The finance–growth nexus in the Middle East and Africa: A comparative meta‐analysis," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(4), pages 4655-4683, October.
    3. Fei Guo & Shi He, 2020. "The finance-growth nexus in China: a meta-analysis," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(13), pages 1071-1075, June.
    4. Clement Olalekan Olaniyi, 2022. "On the transmission mechanisms in the finance–growth nexus in Southern African countries: Does institution matter?," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 55(1), pages 153-191, February.
    5. Miguel Á. Tinoco-Zermeño, 2023. "Energy consumption, financial development, CO2 emissions, and economic growth in 23 developing economies," Remef - Revista Mexicana de Economía y Finanzas Nueva Época REMEF (The Mexican Journal of Economics and Finance), Instituto Mexicano de Ejecutivos de Finanzas, IMEF, vol. 18(1), pages 1-24, Enero - M.
    6. EZZAHID, Elhadj & ELOUAOURTI, Zakaria, 2017. "Financial development and total factors productivity channel: Evidence from Africa," MPRA Paper 81764, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Cristian Valeriu Paun & Radu Cristian Musetescu & Vladimir Mihai Topan & Dan Constantin Danuletiu, 2019. "The Impact of Financial Sector Development and Sophistication on Sustainable Economic Growth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-21, March.
    8. IWASAKI, Ichiro & ONO, Shigeki, 2023. "Economic Development and the Finance-Growth Nexus : A Meta-Analytic Approach," CEI Working Paper Series 2023-06, Center for Economic Institutions, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    financial development; economic growth; Granger causality; SADC;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G20 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - General
    • O1 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development
    • O11 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Macroeconomic Analyses of Economic Development
    • O55 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economywide Country Studies - - - Africa

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.50:year:2016:issue4:pp:81-95. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Abu N.M. Wahid (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cbtnsus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.