IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jda/journl/vol.50year2016issue3pp69-92.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nonlinearity in the efficacy of foreign aid and evidence of poverty traps

Author

Listed:
  • Nicholas Larsen

    (Eastern Washington University, USA)

Abstract

Research on the efficacy of foreign aid has been extensively conducted over the last three decades, but empirically the results remain inconclusive. Previous literature has relied upon linear growth model to estimate their models, methods inconsistent with the existence of poverty traps. These approaches have found that the effect of foreign is either negative, to positive, or even conditional on the policy environment in the country. More recent theoretical literature has started to point towards a nonlinear effect of foreign aid on the level of income. This nonlinear effect is consistent with a poverty trap model. To provide empirical support for this theory this paper relaxes the assumption of linearity in the model to determine if the efficacy of foreign aid is nonlinear. To accomplish this the relationship between foreign aid and the level of income is examined using a cross sectional data set of 72 countries that received Official Development Aid between 1985 and 2014 using a multivariate adaptive regressive splines (MARS) estimation. The MARS model is a nonlinear approach that systematically identifies both threshold levels and interaction terms between independent variables. Most importantly, the MARS model will detect if foreign aid has a statistically significant threshold effect. This finding would be consistent with the poverty trap hypothesis and also explain why there has been a lack of consensus so far. The results suggest that by using a nonlinear estimation we significantly improve, 18 to 44 percent reduction in the residual sum of squares, the fit of our growth model compared to an ordinary least squares estimation, as well as also detect a threshold in the effect of foreign aid that is consistent with a poverty trap hypothesis. These results are consistent when we analyze foreign aid as either a percent of gross national income—threshold at 4.6 percent—or per capita—threshold at $24.97. Below these thresholds the effect of foreign aid is either negative, or statistically zero, but when foreign aid is sufficiently large the effect is large and positive. We also detect significant interactions between foreign aid and both human capital and population growth. The policy implication being that if a country is going to experience a positive impact on their level of income the amount of foreign aid needs to be sufficiently large enough. Furthermore, the interactions suggest that some degree of selectivity should take place on which countries are best equipped to use aid.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicholas Larsen, 2016. "Nonlinearity in the efficacy of foreign aid and evidence of poverty traps," Journal of Developing Areas, Tennessee State University, College of Business, vol. 50(3), pages 69-92, July-Sept.
  • Handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.50:year:2016:issue3:pp:69-92
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://muse.jhu.edu/article/624656
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Olaoye, Olumide Olusegun & Olomola, P.A., 2022. "Empirical analysis of asymmetry phenomenon in the public debt structure of Sub-Saharan Africa's five biggest economies: A Markov-Switching model," The Journal of Economic Asymmetries, Elsevier, vol. 25(C).
    2. Olaoye, Olumide O. & Eluwole, Oluwatosin O. & Ayesha, Aziz & Afolabi, Olugbenga O., 2020. "Government spending and economic growth in ECOWAS: An asymmetric analysis," The Journal of Economic Asymmetries, Elsevier, vol. 22(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Economic Growth; Foreign Aid; Poverty Trap; MARS Model; Nonlinear Econometrics;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F35 - International Economics - - International Finance - - - Foreign Aid
    • O20 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Development Planning and Policy - - - General
    • O40 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.50:year:2016:issue3:pp:69-92. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Abu N.M. Wahid (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cbtnsus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.