IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jda/journl/vol.50year2016issue2pp39-57.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

ASEANi plus six and Successful FTAs: Can India propel intra-industry trade flows?

Author

Listed:
  • Ram Upendra Das
  • Jay Dev Dubey
  • Meenakshi Rishi

    (Research and Information System for Developing Countries, India
    Seattle University, USA)

Abstract

Recent trends suggest that countries have turned away from the multilateral process in favor of free trade agreements (FTAs). However, whether FTAs increase trade among their members or result in efficiencies through trade diversion to more inefficient trading partners has remained a debatable issue. This paper sheds fresh light on FTAs by incorporating new trade theories that explain Intra-Industry Trade (IIT) flows that have hitherto not received adequate attention in the current literature on FTAs. Further, regional trade integration among ASEAN+6 nations in goods through IIT has special significance in the context of regional production chains. A lack of emphasis on these issues has perpetuated ambiguities in the policy-making and negotiating processes. The paper analyzes the relationship between Revealed Comparative Advantage (RCA) and IIT, which is further divided into Horizontal IIT and Vertical IIT. Under Vertical IIT, trade can be explained through the traditional trade models of absolute or comparative advantage, as the creation of high quality products can be factor-specific. Considering that RCA can represent and capture the traditional theories of trade, RCA should be positively correlated with IIT, especially vertical IIT. On the other hand, horizontal IIT includes goods that are close to each other in terms of quality and price and can be explained by Krugman’s model. This brings up our hypothesis - Does India, as a source of IIT, impel higher trade among the ASEAN+6 region through an FTA? We investigate this by means of an augmented gravity model, tested through panel Tobit methodology. The findings suggest that an ASEAN+6 FTA in goods IIT can be sustained via the impact of such an FTA on trade-FDI nexus, efficiency-seeking economic restructuring, horizontal and vertical integration, economies of scale, competition, technological improvements, and product differentiation, all of which facilitate regional value chains. The paper also demonstrates—both theoretically and empirically—that combining an FTA in goods among ASEAN+6 countries under the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) with greater trade integration, especially with India’s active role in the RCEP, both propels Intra-Industry type trade flows in the region as well as helps to sustain trade flows. These findings have important policy implications for India’s participation in RCEP negotiations with adept handling of Modalities of Tariff Reduction under RCEP; IIT-enhancing Trade in Services and Investment Negotiations; and Cooperation in Appropriate Technology.

Suggested Citation

  • Ram Upendra Das & Jay Dev Dubey & Meenakshi Rishi, 2016. "ASEANi plus six and Successful FTAs: Can India propel intra-industry trade flows?," Journal of Developing Areas, Tennessee State University, College of Business, vol. 50(2), pages 39-57, April-Jun.
  • Handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.50:year:2016:issue2:pp:39-57
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://muse.jhu.edu/article/621334
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Amlan Ray & M. G. Deepika & G. Badri Narayanan, 2021. "Analysis of India’s Competitive Position in RCEP," Vision, , vol. 25(3), pages 336-349, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    RCEP; Free Trade Agreement; Intra-Industry Trade; Tobit;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F11 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Neoclassical Models of Trade
    • F12 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Models of Trade with Imperfect Competition and Scale Economies; Fragmentation
    • F14 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Empirical Studies of Trade
    • F15 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Economic Integration

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.50:year:2016:issue2:pp:39-57. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Abu N.M. Wahid (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cbtnsus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.