IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jda/journl/vol.50year2016issue2pp349-366.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Agricultural productivity growth in India: An analysis accounting for different land types

Author

Listed:
  • Varun Kumar Das

    (Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, India)

Abstract

Agricultural endeavour in India has moved from being a traditional farming practice to a more modern and mechanized enterprise. One of the important prerequisite for raising agricultural production and mitigating supply constraints is enhancing agricultural productivity. Since traditional input resources are limited, an increase in agricultural production has to come from enhancing agricultural productivity. With the onset of Green Revolution in India, the contribution of modern technology towards raising agricultural production has been immense. Total Factor Productivity (TFP) growth in agriculture assesses the contribution of knowledge and efficiency towards raising agricultural production. For a comprehensive study of growth of the agriculture sector, TFP analyses should include the allied sectors like livestock, forestry and fishing as well. However, in estimating agricultural TFP growth, it is essential to account for the type of land being used for crop production. An addition of an acre of irrigated land will be much more productive than an addition of rainfed land. Similarly, an acre of rainfed land will yield more crop than an acre of pastureland, which is usually used for grazing purpose for livestock. Access to irrigated land protects farmers from the risks and uncertainties of vagaries of weather. In this study we derive weights for rainfed cropland, irrigated cropland and pastureland based on their relative productivity. Using the traditional Solow index method and accounting for different land type viz. rainfed land, irrigated land and pasture land, we measure TFP growth of the agriculture and allied sector in India from 1981 to 2008. Our results show that agricultural TFP growth in India for this period ranged between 1% during 1981-1990 to about 1.7% during 2000-2008. Growth in TFP was higher during the post reform period than during the pre reform period. We also find that usage in agricultural inputs has declined during the post reform period compared to the pre reform period. Our findings also show that, though contribution of TFP towards output growth was declining during the initial years, it however shows a rising trend towards explaining output growth during the last decade.

Suggested Citation

  • Varun Kumar Das, 2016. "Agricultural productivity growth in India: An analysis accounting for different land types," Journal of Developing Areas, Tennessee State University, College of Business, vol. 50(2), pages 349-366, April-Jun.
  • Handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.50:year:2016:issue2:pp:349-366
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://muse.jhu.edu/article/621350
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Total Factor Productivity; Agriculture; Land;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D24 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Production; Cost; Capital; Capital, Total Factor, and Multifactor Productivity; Capacity
    • O13 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Agriculture; Natural Resources; Environment; Other Primary Products
    • Q16 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - R&D; Agricultural Technology; Biofuels; Agricultural Extension Services
    • Q24 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Land

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.50:year:2016:issue2:pp:349-366. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Abu N.M. Wahid (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cbtnsus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.