IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jda/journl/vol.50year2016issue2pp127-136.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Debt arrears as a signal of sovereign defaults

Author

Listed:
  • Hussein Zeaiter

    (Lebanese American University, Lebanon)

Abstract

The accuracy of the inference about the risk of default is very important to the potential creditors in their lending decisions. In the literature, the usual used indicators of sovereign default in a given country (debtor) are either a rescheduling agreement between the debtor and the creditor or the presence of a credit from the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The purpose of this note is to investigate an alternative indicator of a sovereign default that precedes the default itself, and thus could be seen as an early warning signal for policymakers. In this note, debtor countries are considered “defaulted” on sovereign debt if they have a debt rescheduling agreement with at least one creditor. To address our research question, a panel dataset running from 1970 to 2010 and spanning 186 countries with at least one year of debt accumulation is used. First a Panel Probit model is estimated including all the variables along with the lags of Arrears. Then, in order to explore the role played in countries that have defaulted; we divide the sample into countries with a history of sovereign defaults, and countries with no such history. Further, in order to explore the role played in countries that have defaulted; we divide the sample into countries with a history of sovereign defaults, and countries with no such history. If a country has at least one rescheduling agreement during the years 1970-2010 then the country is considered defaulted and it is included in the “default” subset. To be included in the “no default” subset, the country should not have had any rescheduling agreement during the aforementioned period. Our results show that debt arrears are not only a good determinant of default as argued in the literature but their lagged arrears can also be used as an early warning signal for sovereign defaults. However, the accumulation of arrears does not automatically trigger a default. Moreover, the likelihood to default rises when the failure to pay debt obligations continues overtime until the actual default occurs after the obligations in the third year are not paid. These results are very crucial to both debtors and creditors. Arrears, consequently, could be used as an inducement for debtors to take preemptive actions to minimize exposure to sovereign default risk. However, even in the case of default, observing arrears will provide ample time for policy makers in debtor countries to take necessary precautionary measures.

Suggested Citation

  • Hussein Zeaiter, 2016. "Debt arrears as a signal of sovereign defaults," Journal of Developing Areas, Tennessee State University, College of Business, vol. 50(2), pages 127-136, April-Jun.
  • Handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.50:year:2016:issue2:pp:127-136
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://muse.jhu.edu/article/621339
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gilles Dufrénot & Anne-Charlotte Paret, 2018. "Sovereign debt in emerging market countries: not all of them are serial defaulters," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(59), pages 6406-6443, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Debt Arrears; Reschedule Agreements; Sovereign Debt Defaults; Panel Debt;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H63 - Public Economics - - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt - - - Debt; Debt Management; Sovereign Debt
    • F34 - International Economics - - International Finance - - - International Lending and Debt Problems

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.50:year:2016:issue2:pp:127-136. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Abu N.M. Wahid (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cbtnsus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.