IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jda/journl/vol.50year2016issue1pp29-46.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Technical and scale efficiency of Tanzanian saving and credit cooperatives

Author

Listed:
  • Nyankomo Marwa
  • Meshach Aziakpono

    (Stellenbosch University, South Africa)

Abstract

The financial sector plays a critical role in economic growth and economic development (Beck & Levine 2004; Levine 1998). However, the impact of the financial sector on economic growth is realized if the sector is efficiently managed and well monitored. The corollary to this is that if the financial sector is not effectively monitored and regulated it may lead to economic crisis. As argued by Sufian (2011) the health of the financial sector is critical for the health of the economy at large. Given the relationship between the financial sector development and economic growth, knowledge about the efficiency of financial institutions and the underlying factors that influence efficiency is crucial. Such knowledge is necessary to provide insights for managers, regulators, policy makers and other stakeholders to formulate policies to improve the efficiency of the financial sector. Despite the importance of knowledge on health industry as articulated above, there is paucity of empirical literature on the performance of financial cooperatives in developing countries and Tanzania in particular. Thus, the objective of this paper is to empirically analyze the efficiency of Tanzanian Saving and Credit Cooperatives. Efficiency analysis was decomposed into three dimensions to explore possible sources of inefficiency. The first dimension was technical efficiency, which explored the overall effectiveness of transforming the productive inputs into desired outputs compared to the data-driven frontier of best practice. The second dimension was pure technical efficiency, which captured managerial efficiency in the intermediation process. The third dimension was scale efficiency, which explored whether firms were operating in an optimal scale of operation. The study used a sample of 103 audited financial statements during 2011. Data envelopment analysis was employed to explore the efficiency scores. The results show that average scores are 42%, 52% and 76% for technical, pure technical and scale efficiencies respectively. Since most of the inefficiencies are either technical or scale in nature, the study recommends increasing the operating scale for smaller firms. Firms operating beyond the optimal scale may need to downsize. Also the managers from technically inefficient firms should reduce the wastage of the productive resources by utilizing their inputs more efficiently.

Suggested Citation

  • Nyankomo Marwa & Meshach Aziakpono, 2016. "Technical and scale efficiency of Tanzanian saving and credit cooperatives," Journal of Developing Areas, Tennessee State University, College of Business, vol. 50(1), pages 29-46, January-M.
  • Handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.50:year:2016:issue1:pp:29-46
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://muse.jhu.edu/article/609321
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ramesh C. Paudel & Chakra Pani Acharya, 2022. "Cooperatives and economic growth in a developing country: The case of Nepal," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 93(3), pages 797-815, September.
    2. Leonard Rang’ala Lari & Philip Mulama NYangweso & Lucy Jepchoge Rono, 2017. "Determinants of Technical Inefficiency of Saccos in Kenya: A Net Operating Cash Flows Output Slack Analysis," Asian Journal of Economics and Empirical Research, Asian Online Journal Publishing Group, vol. 4(2), pages 49-60.
    3. Benjamin Tetteh Anang & Stefan Bäckman & Antonios Rezitis, 2016. "Does farm size matter? Investigating scale efficiency of peasant rice farmers in northern Ghana," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 36(4), pages 2275-2290.
    4. Mohamed Dia & Pawoumodom M. Takouda & Amirmohsen Golmohammadi, 2022. "Assessing the performance of Canadian credit unions using a three-stage network bootstrap DEA," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 311(2), pages 641-673, April.
    5. Girma Jirata Duguma & Jiqin Han, 2021. "Effect of deposit mobilization on the technical efficiency of rural saving and credit cooperatives: Evidence from Ethiopia," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 92(4), pages 621-647, December.
    6. Michael Takudzwa Pasara & Albert Makochekanwa & Steven Henry Dunga, 2021. "The Role of Savings and Credit Cooperatives (SACCOs) on Financial Inclusion in Zimbabwe," Eurasian Journal of Business and Management, Eurasian Publications, vol. 9(1), pages 47-60.
    7. Thembi Xaba & Nyankomo Marwa & Babita Mathur-Helm, 2018. "Efficiency and Profitability Analysis of Agricultural Cooperatives in Mpumalanga, South Africa," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 10(6), pages 1-10.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Efficiency; Saving and Credit Cooperatives; Data Envelopment Analysis; Tanzania;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages
    • D2 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations
    • C5 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.50:year:2016:issue1:pp:29-46. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Abu N.M. Wahid (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cbtnsus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.