IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jda/journl/vol.49year2015issue4pp59-67.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Kaldor’s hypothesis hold in India?

Author

Listed:
  • A. Sankaran*
  • Amaresh Samantaraya

    (Pondicherry University, India)

Abstract

Issues relating to the interaction between the industrial sector of an economy and the overall economic activity under Kaldor’s hypothesis have been an interesting area of research. While a number of empirical studies have been carried out to test Kaldor’s hypothesis in many industrial and emerging economies, a similar study in the Indian context is conspicuously absent. With a series of comprehensive economic reforms initiatives introduced in India during the last two decades, there has been greater market orientation in the overall economy, and the inter-linkages between the industrial sector and the overall economy have assumed new dimensions. Against this backdrop, the present study empirically examines Kaldor’s hypothesis in the Indian context. For the empirical investigation, various time series econometric techniques such as Johansen and Juselius co-integration test and Granger causality test are applied to examine the relationship between industrial output and overall economic growth measured in terms of Gross National Product. The co-integration analysis takes into account the non-stationarity problem in the data, which is generally observed in various macroeconomic time series. It examines the presence of long-term stability in the relationship between two or more time series when they are integrated of order 1. The associated error correction mechanism explores the short term dynamics along with the adjustment process. We have used Indian annual data covering the period 1970-2011 for the empirical exercises. From the estimated results, it was revealed that both our time series under investigation, viz., industrial sector output and overall GNP were non-stationary and integrated of order 1. But the Johansen-Juselius co-integration test established long-term stability in their association. The error-correction mechanism revealed that any short-term discrepancy in the relationship was corrected over time. The results also showed a unidirectional causality running from economic growth to growth in industrial sector. Thus, GNP-led industrial growth pattern exists in India, and our findings fail to provide evidence supporting Kaldor’s hypothesis in the context of fast-growing Indian economy. The findings of the present study have important policy implications. Given the fact that the industrial sector is the backbone of the overall economy, it needs to grow consistently. Particularly, the policy makers in India should strive to promote India’s manufacturing exports along with the service sector.

Suggested Citation

  • A. Sankaran* & Amaresh Samantaraya, 2015. "Does Kaldor’s hypothesis hold in India?," Journal of Developing Areas, Tennessee State University, College of Business, vol. 49(4), pages 59-67, October-D.
  • Handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.49:year:2015:issue4:pp:59-67
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/journal_of_developing_areas/v049/49.4.sankaran.html
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Oluwatoyin Matthew & Romanus Osabohien & Fasina Fagbeminiyi & Afolake Fasina, 2018. "Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Health Outcomes in Nigeria: Empirical Insight from Auto-regressive Distribution Lag Technique," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 8(3), pages 43-50.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Kaldor’s hypothesis; Industrial growth; GNP; Industrial output;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O14 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Industrialization; Manufacturing and Service Industries; Choice of Technology
    • N6 - Economic History - - Manufacturing and Construction

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.49:year:2015:issue4:pp:59-67. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Abu N.M. Wahid (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cbtnsus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.