IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jda/journl/vol.48year2014issue1pp177-197.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Who benefits from spending on water and electricity in Nigeria? A benefit incidence analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Reuben Adeolu Alabi
  • Oshobugie Ojor Admas

    (Ambrose Alli University, Nigeria)

Abstract

This study estimated Progressivity of Benefit, Average and Marginal Benefit Incidence of public spending on pipe borne water and electricity in Nigeria, using Nigeria Bureau of Statistics (NBS) Living Standard Household Survey Data of 2004. The various analyses were carried out using Distributive Analysis Stata Package (DASP) 2.1. The results of the analyses show that the spending on the utilities in Nigeria is not pro-poor. The marginal benefit incidence of spending on the utilities in Nigeria indicates that the poorest group can only benefit more than the richest group from extra spending on the utility in which their current accessibility rate is high. Finally, from the findings of this study we formulated policy recommendations that will make the public spending in Nigeria pro-poor in order to accelerate the speed at which the poor benefit more from increases in access to the utilities in the country.

Suggested Citation

  • Reuben Adeolu Alabi & Oshobugie Ojor Admas, 2014. "Who benefits from spending on water and electricity in Nigeria? A benefit incidence analysis," Journal of Developing Areas, Tennessee State University, College of Business, vol. 48(1), pages 177-197, January-M.
    • Handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.48:year:2014:issue1:pp:177-197
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/journal_of_developing_areas/v048/48.1.alabi.html
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mouhamed Samba & Ibrahima Thiam & Elisabeth Paul, 2024. "Which socio-economic groups benefit most from public health expenditure in Senegal? A dynamic benefit incidence analysis," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/378404, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Marginal; Benefit; Public; Spending; Nigeria;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H50 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - General
    • H51 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Government Expenditures and Health
    • H52 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Government Expenditures and Education

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.48:year:2014:issue1:pp:177-197. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Abu N.M. Wahid (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cbtnsus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.