IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jda/journl/vol.41year2008issue2pp91-109.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Specialization, fragmentation, and factor intensities: evidence from chilean plant-level data

Author

Listed:
  • Chul Chung
  • Alan V. Deardorff

    (Korea Institute for International Economic Policy, Korea
    University of Michigan, USA)

Abstract

We examine the effects of trade liberalization on structural changes at the plant-level and industry-level. The traditional Heckscher-Ohlin (H-O) model predicts an increase in capital-labor ratios in a labor abundant country after trade liberalization. This is in marked contrast to the implications of an otherwise similar model in which trade is the result of costly fragmentation, which predicts a declining pattern of capital-labor ratios following trade liberalization. Empirical results from Chilean plant-level data and industry-level data are rather consistent with fragmentation, which seems to require structural changes caused by trade liberalization.

Suggested Citation

  • Chul Chung & Alan V. Deardorff, 2008. "Specialization, fragmentation, and factor intensities: evidence from chilean plant-level data," Journal of Developing Areas, Tennessee State University, College of Business, vol. 41(2), pages 91-109, January-M.
  • Handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.41:year:2008:issue2:pp:91-109
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/jda/summary/v041/41.2chung.html
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Fragmentation; Factor Intensity; Heckscher-Ohlin; Trade liberalization; Chile;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F11 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Neoclassical Models of Trade
    • F14 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Empirical Studies of Trade
    • O24 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Development Planning and Policy - - - Trade Policy; Factor Movement; Foreign Exchange Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.41:year:2008:issue2:pp:91-109. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Abu N.M. Wahid (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cbtnsus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.