Author
Listed:
- Devenish, A. J. M.
- Schmitter, Petra
(International Water Management Institute)
- Jellason, N. P.
- Esmail, N.
- Abdi, N. M.
- Adanu, S. K.
- Adolph, B.
- Al-Zu’bi, Maha
(International Water Management Institute)
- Amali, A. A.
- Barron, J.
- Chapman, A. S. A.
- Chausson, A. M.
- Chibesa, M.
- Davies, J.
- Dugan, E.
- Edwards, G. I.
- Egeru, A.
- Gebrehiwot, T.
- Griffiths, G. H.
- Haile, A.
- Hunga, H. G.
- Igbine, L.
- Jarju, O. M.
- Keya, F.
- Khalifa, M.
- Ledoux, W. A.
- Lejissa, L. T.
- Loupa, P.
- Lwanga, J.
- Mapedza, Everisto D.
(International Water Management Institute)
- Marchant, R.
- McLoud, T.
- Mukuyu, Patience
(International Water Management Institute)
- Musah, L. M.
- Mwanza, M.
- Mwitwa, J.
- Neina, D.
- Newbold, T.
- Njogo, S.
- Robinson, E. J. Z.
- Singini, W.
- Umar, B. B.
- Wesonga, F.
- Willcock, S.
- Yang, J.
- Tobias, J. A.
Abstract
Sub-Saharan Africa is facing an expected doubling of human population and tripling of food demand over the next quarter century, posing a range of severe environmental, political, and socio-economic challenges. In some cases, key Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are in direct conflict, raising difficult policy and funding decisions, particularly in relation to trade-offs between food production, social inequality, and ecosystem health. In this study, we used a horizon-scanning approach to identify 100 practical or research-focused questions that, if answered, would have the greatest positive impact on addressing these trade-offs and ensuring future productivity and resilience of food-production systems across sub-Saharan Africa. Through direct canvassing of opinions, we obtained 1339 questions from 331 experts based in 55 countries. We then used online voting and participatory workshops to produce a final list of 100 questions divided into 12 thematic sections spanning topics from gender inequality to technological adoption and climate change. Using data on the background of respondents, we show that perspectives and priorities can vary, but they are largely consistent across different professional and geographical contexts. We hope these questions provide a template for establishing new research directions and prioritising funding decisions in sub-Saharan Africa.
Suggested Citation
Devenish, A. J. M. & Schmitter, Petra & Jellason, N. P. & Esmail, N. & Abdi, N. M. & Adanu, S. K. & Adolph, B. & Al-Zu’bi, Maha & Amali, A. A. & Barron, J. & Chapman, A. S. A. & Chausson, A. M. & Ch, 2023.
"One hundred priority questions for the development of sustainable food systems in Sub-Saharan Africa,"
Papers published in Journals (Open Access), International Water Management Institute, pages 12(10):1879.
Handle:
RePEc:iwt:jounls:h052331
DOI: 10.3390/land12101879
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iwt:jounls:h052331. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chandima Gunadasa (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iwmiclk.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.