Author
Abstract
The development of digital technologies is moving work beyond institutional and physical boundaries, leading to the replacement of traditional work models with new and flexible work models compatible with technological innovations. The term telemigrant, introduced by Richard Baldwin in his 2019 article "The Globotics Upheaval: Globalisation, Robotics and the Future of Work", together with the terms offshoring and remote work, forms a new typology that describes non-traditional forms of work. Telemigrants are individuals who work remotely for an employer in another country while physically residing in one country. This study examines and discusses the concept of telemigrant in conjunction with remote work and offshore configurations, analysing the impact of these developments on industrial relations. A systematic literature review was conducted using sources on remote work and offshoring to understand the emergence of the telemigration trend and explore the underlying reasons behind this new work model. Based on the specified inclusion criteria, 15 articles were analysed. The findings from the systematic literature review show that digitalisation and globalisation are gradually transforming the traditional labour market. Remote work allows employees to perform their tasks through digital tools without physically attending a workplace, while offshoring enables employers to access labour in low-cost countries. As traditional business models give way to new forms of work such as telemigration, it has been found that this shift presents both significant challenges and opportunities for industrial relations. The protection of workers’ rights and the development of new organisational models suited to digitalisation processes are becoming increasingly important topics in the industrial relation literature.
Suggested Citation
Serpil Çiğdem Yücel, 2024.
"Remote Work and Telemigrants: The New Face of Offshoring and Its Effects on Industrial Relations,"
Journal of Social Policy Conferences, Istanbul University, Faculty of Economics, issue 87, pages 24-43, December.
Handle:
RePEc:ist:iujspc:y:2024:i:87:p:24-43
DOI: 10.26650/jspc.2024.87.1575047
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ist:iujspc:y:2024:i:87:p:24-43. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Istanbul University Press Operational Team (Ertuğrul YAŞAR) (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifisttr.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.