IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ist/iujepr/v10y2023i2p629-661.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public–Private Partnership Practices in the World and Türkiye: A Numerical Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Recep Emre Ericok

    (Istanbul Universitesi, Iktisat Fakultesi Maliye Bolumu, Istanbul, Turkiye)

Abstract

Nowadays, there is a growing consensus on the importance of infrastructure investments in terms of economic and social development. In this context, public-private partnerships are recognized as one of the most important instruments for supporting infrastructure investments. In Türkiye, public-private partnership practices have been utilized extensively in the execution of numerous projects for more than three decades. This study was designed to evaluate and analyze with numerical data the public-private partnership practices in the world and Türkiye within thecontext of global developments in the field of public-private partnership. First, the conceptual framework of publicprivate partnership was examined, and then numerical data on public-private partnership practices in the world andTürkiye were analyzed in light of the increasing infrastructure investment need. The study’s results show that Türkiye’spublic-private partnership practices differ from those of other countries, and that the public-private partnership governance framework, particularly the management and reporting of fiscal risks and fiscal transparency should be improved. Furthermore, the fiscal risks incurred due to contingent liabilities provided within the scope of publicprivate partnership projects have increased. To reduce fiscal risks and improve fiscal transparency in the field of publicprivate partnership, stakeholders must provide contingent liabilities in Turkish Lira rather than foreign currency and avoid long-term guarantees. Moreover, information on guarantees given by institutions that implement public-private partnership projects other than the Treasury should be shared with the public transparently and regularly. Alternatively,all guarantees should be gathered under a single institution and resources should be used effectively and converted into efficient investments and directed to priority sectors. If these objectives are met, it is anticipated that discussions on public-private partnerships in Türkiye will decrease, the potential contributions of these projects will be enhanced, and their positive contribution to Türkiye’s economic performance will increase

Suggested Citation

  • Recep Emre Ericok, 2023. "Public–Private Partnership Practices in the World and Türkiye: A Numerical Analysis," Journal of Economic Policy Researches, Istanbul University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 10(2), pages 629-661, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:ist:iujepr:v:10:y:2023:i:2:p:629-661
    DOI: 10.26650/JEPR1310789
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cdn.istanbul.edu.tr/file/JTA6CLJ8T5/13D64425B2E943A2A371939E9923452E
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://iupress.istanbul.edu.tr/en/journal/jepr/article/dunyada-ve-turkiyede-kamu-ozel-isbirligi-uygulamalari-rakamsal-verilerle-bir-analiz
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.26650/JEPR1310789?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Suhaiza Ismail, 2013. "Drivers of value for money public private partnership projects in Malaysia," Asian Review of Accounting, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 21(3), pages 241-256, September.
    2. repec:ces:ifodic:v:12:y:2014:i:3:p:19126463 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Suhaiza Ismail, 2013. "Drivers of value for money public private partnership projects in Malaysia," Asian Review of Accounting, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 21(3), pages 241-256, September.
    4. Antonio Estache & Stéphane Saussier, 2014. "Public-Private Partnerships and Efficiency: A Short Assessment," ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 12(03), pages 08-13, October.
    5. Hyeon Park & Shin Lee & Jaeyoung Kim, 2018. "Do public private partnership projects deliver value for money? An ex post Value for Money (VfM) Test on three road projects in Korea," International Journal of Urban Sciences, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(4), pages 579-591, October.
    6. Antonio Estache & Stéphane Saussier, 2014. "Public-Private Partnerships and Efficiency: A Short Assessment," ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 12(3), pages 08-13, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Athias, Laure & Saussier, Stéphane, 2018. "Are public private partnerships that rigid? And why? Evidence from price provisions in French toll road concession contracts," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 174-186.
    2. Pierre M. Picard & Ridwan D. Rusli, 2018. "State‐owned firms and private debt," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 20(5), pages 672-702, October.
    3. Ulrich Schüle & Franz Liening-Ewert & Daniel Schäffer & Edith Zeppenfeld, 2019. "Opening Argentina to Public-Private Partnerships: Opportunities and Risks for Government Entities and Private Investors," Athens Journal of Business & Economics, Athens Institute for Education and Research (ATINER), vol. 5(3), pages 185-206, July.
    4. Schüle, Ulrich & Liening-Ewert, F. & Schäffer, D., 2018. "Opening Argentina to public-private partnerships: Opportunities and risks for government entities and private investors," UASM Discussion Paper Series 8/2018, University of Applied Sciences Mainz.
    5. repec:bla:annpce:v:89:y:2018:i:1:p:25-48 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Aidan R. Vining & David L. Weimer, 2016. "The challenges of fractionalized property rights in public‐private hybrid organizations: The good, the bad, and the ugly," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(2), pages 161-178, June.
    7. Fabre, Anaïs & Straub, Stéphane, 2019. "The Impact of Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) in Infrastructure, Health and Education: A Review," TSE Working Papers 19-986, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), revised Sep 2021.
    8. Anna Matas & Ginés de Rus & Stef Proost & Salvador Bertoméu-Sánchez & Antonio Estache, 2018. "The Financing of Infrastructure / La financiación de las infraestructuras / El finançament de les infraestructures," IEB Reports ieb_report_1_2018, Institut d'Economia de Barcelona (IEB).
    9. Nunzia Carbonara & Roberta Pellegrino, 2020. "The role of public private partnerships in fostering innovation," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(2), pages 140-156, February.
    10. World Bank Group, 2016. "Benchmarking Public-Private Partnerships Procurement 2017," World Bank Publications - Reports 25089, The World Bank Group.
    11. Sylvester Ngome Chisika & Chunho Yeom, 2021. "Enhancing Sustainable Management of Public Natural Forests Through Public Private Partnerships in Kenya," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, October.
    12. Bae, Bumjoon & Seo, Changbeom, 2022. "Do public-private partnerships help improve road safety? Finding empirical evidence using panel data models," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 336-342.
    13. Välilä, Timo, 2020. "An overview of economic theory and evidence of public-private partnerships in the procurement of (transport) infrastructure," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    14. Xuhui Cong & Li Ma, 2018. "Performance Evaluation of Public-Private Partnership Projects from the Perspective of Efficiency, Economic, Effectiveness, and Equity: A Study of Residential Renovation Projects in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-21, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Public-private partnership; Infrastructure investments; Number of projects; Investment value; Government guarantees JEL Classification : H00 ; H43 ; H44;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H00 - Public Economics - - General - - - General
    • H43 - Public Economics - - Publicly Provided Goods - - - Project Evaluation; Social Discount Rate
    • H44 - Public Economics - - Publicly Provided Goods - - - Publicly Provided Goods: Mixed Markets

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ist:iujepr:v:10:y:2023:i:2:p:629-661. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ertugrul YASAR (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifisttr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.