IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ortrsc/v58y2024i2p474-498.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Crowdkeeping in Last-Mile Delivery

Author

Listed:
  • Xin Wang

    (GERAD and Department of Decision Sciences, HEC Montréal, Montréal, Québec H3T 2A7, Canada)

  • Okan Arslan

    (GERAD and Department of Decision Sciences, HEC Montréal, Montréal, Québec H3T 2A7, Canada)

  • Erick Delage

    (GERAD and Department of Decision Sciences, HEC Montréal, Montréal, Québec H3T 2A7, Canada)

Abstract

In order to improve the efficiency of the last-mile delivery system when customers are possibly absent for deliveries, we propose the idea of employing the crowd to work as keepers and to provide storage services for their neighbors. Crowd keepers have extra flexibility, more availability, and lower costs than fixed storage options such as automated lockers, and this leads to a more efficient and a more profitable system for last-mile deliveries. We present a bilevel program that jointly determines the assignment, routing, and pricing decisions while considering customer preferences, keeper behaviors, and platform operations. We develop an equivalent single-level program, a mixed-integer linear program with subtour elimination constraints, that can be solved to optimality using a row generation algorithm. To improve the efficiency of the solution procedure, we further derive exact best response sets for both customers and keepers, and approximate optimal travel times using linear regression. We present a numerical study using a real-world data set from Amazon. The fixed-storage and no-storage systems are used as benchmarks to assess the performance of the crowdkeeping system. The results show that the crowdkeeping delivery system has the potential to generate higher profits because of its ability to consolidate deliveries and to eliminate failed deliveries.

Suggested Citation

  • Xin Wang & Okan Arslan & Erick Delage, 2024. "Crowdkeeping in Last-Mile Delivery," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(2), pages 474-498, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ortrsc:v:58:y:2024:i:2:p:474-498
    DOI: 10.1287/trsc.2022.0323
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2022.0323
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/trsc.2022.0323?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ortrsc:v:58:y:2024:i:2:p:474-498. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.