Author
Listed:
- Theresa Gattermann-Itschert
(Department of Supply Chain Management and Management Science, University of Cologne, 50932 Cologne, Germany)
- Laura Maria Poreschack
(Department of Supply Chain Management and Management Science, University of Cologne, 50932 Cologne, Germany)
- Ulrich W. Thonemann
(Department of Supply Chain Management and Management Science, University of Cologne, 50932 Cologne, Germany)
Abstract
In crew scheduling, optimization models can become complex when a large number of penalty terms is included in the objective function to take planners’ preferences into account. Planners’ preferences often include nonmonetary aspects for which both the mathematical formulation and the assignment of appropriate penalty costs can be difficult. We address this problem by using machine learning to learn and predict planners’ preferences. We train a random forest classifier on planner feedback regarding duties from their daily work in railway crew scheduling. Our data set contains over 16,000 duties that planners labeled as good or bad. The trained model predicts the probability that a duty is perceived as bad by the planners. We present a novel approach to replace the large construct of penalty terms in a crew scheduling optimization model by a single term that penalizes duties proportionally to the predicted probability of being assessed as unfavorable by a planner. By integrating this probability into the optimization model, we generate schedules that include more duties with preferred characteristics. We increase the mean planner acceptance probability by more than 12% while only facing a marginal increase in costs compared with the original approach that utilizes a set of multiple penalty terms. Our approach combines machine learning to detect complex patterns regarding favorable duty characteristics and optimization to create feasible and cost-efficient crew schedules.
Suggested Citation
Theresa Gattermann-Itschert & Laura Maria Poreschack & Ulrich W. Thonemann, 2023.
"Using Machine Learning to Include Planners’ Preferences in Railway Crew Scheduling Optimization,"
Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(3), pages 796-812, May.
Handle:
RePEc:inm:ortrsc:v:57:y:2023:i:3:p:796-812
DOI: 10.1287/trsc.2022.1196
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ortrsc:v:57:y:2023:i:3:p:796-812. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.