Author
Listed:
- Shyue Koong Chang
(National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China)
- Paul M. Schonfeld
(University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742)
Abstract
Analytic models are developed and used in comparing fixed route conventional bus and flexible route subscription bus systems for providing feeder services to a single point (such as a transportation terminal). In the mathematical models for these two systems, vehicle size and service zone size are the optimizable decision variables, and total system cost, including operator and user costs, is the objective function to be minimized. Average cost per trip is the criterion used to determine which system is preferable and how it should be optimized in various circumstances. With an approximation for subscription services, closed form solutions for optimal vehicle size and service zone area are obtained for both alternatives. The analytic results for optimized conventional services indicate that constant ratios should be maintained at all demand densities between vehicle size and route spacing and between fleet size and user wait time. Analytic solutions are extended to conditions where (1) demand and costs are time dependent, requiring multiperiod optimization and (2) the maximum load factor may differ from 1.0 to allow for standees and stochastic demand fluctuations. A method for comparing the two systems when their service levels generate different passenger volumes is also presented. Sensitivity analyses indicate that the relative advantage of subscription bus services generally increases with smaller service areas, higher speeds, lower fixed bus cost, lower incremental costs of vehicle size, higher values of access and wait time, and lower values of in-vehicle time.
Suggested Citation
Shyue Koong Chang & Paul M. Schonfeld, 1991.
"Optimization Models for Comparing Conventional and Subscription Bus Feeder Services,"
Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(4), pages 281-298, November.
Handle:
RePEc:inm:ortrsc:v:25:y:1991:i:4:p:281-298
DOI: 10.1287/trsc.25.4.281
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ortrsc:v:25:y:1991:i:4:p:281-298. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.