IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ortrsc/v1y1967i3p206-217.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Significance Test for Accident Reductions Based on Classical Statistics and Economic Consequences

Author

Listed:
  • Stephen K. Dietz

    (Westat Research, Inc., Bethesda, Maryland)

Abstract

This paper provides a simple test for the statistical significance of accident reductions. Such a test is applicable when some change has occurred at a highway location and we wish to know whether or not the difference between the number of accidents “before” and “after” represents a statistically significant reduction. In arriving at a decision based on random data we run the risk of occasionally (a) claiming a reduction in accidents when there is none (i.e., type I error), or (b) failing to claim a reduction when it exists (i.e., type II error). A decision procedure is proposed that considers these errors and their costs, and provides curves that indicate trade-offs in the probabilities of making each of the two types of error. Most of the statistical theory used in this paper is generally well known. However, the selection of significance levels based on economic considerations represents an improvement over the all too common practice of arbitrarily selecting significance levels for type I errors and ignoring type II errors altogether.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephen K. Dietz, 1967. "Significance Test for Accident Reductions Based on Classical Statistics and Economic Consequences," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 1(3), pages 206-217, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:ortrsc:v:1:y:1967:i:3:p:206-217
    DOI: 10.1287/trsc.1.3.206
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/trsc.1.3.206
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/trsc.1.3.206?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ortrsc:v:1:y:1967:i:3:p:206-217. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.