IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ortrsc/v13y1979i4p343-357.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Common Transport Policy: A Case of Lost Direction?

Author

Listed:
  • John Whitelegg

    (University of Lancaster, Lancaster, England)

Abstract

The European Economic Community (E.E.C.) has, since its inception, pursued “common” policies in areas which have a strategic significance for the long term aims of the community. The most significant “common” policy is the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) but of real importance for E.E.C. goals of stimulating the economy and improving the conditions of cross-frontier freight movements is the Common Transport Policy (CTP). It is argued in this paper that while the CTP has made significant progress in the “regulation,” “harmonization.” “charging for infrastructure” and related areas it has failed to recognize the wider environment of transport and in particular the ways in which transport policies are inextricably linked with other policies of the E.E.C. Successive policy statements are examined to illustrate how the E.E.C.'s view of transport can be seen to be increasingly narrow and unrelated to the central issues of community development in the period immediately preceding Economic and Monetary Union. While very critical of E.E.C. policy the underlying assumption is that transport is a core policy through and with which one can advance the central issues, as long as the links between policies are understood and the administrative machinery reflects this.

Suggested Citation

  • John Whitelegg, 1979. "The Common Transport Policy: A Case of Lost Direction?," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 13(4), pages 343-357, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ortrsc:v:13:y:1979:i:4:p:343-357
    DOI: 10.1287/trsc.13.4.343
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/trsc.13.4.343
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/trsc.13.4.343?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ortrsc:v:13:y:1979:i:4:p:343-357. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.