IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orstsc/v10y2025i1p68-92.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Innovation Disclosures and the Design of Technology Acquisition Contracts: Evidence from the American Inventors Protection Act

Author

Listed:
  • Jeffrey J. Reuer

    (Mitchell E. Daniels, Jr. School of Business, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47906)

  • Sandip Bisui

    (Mitchell E. Daniels, Jr. School of Business, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47906)

  • George Chondrakis

    (Department of Strategy and General Management, ESADE Business School, Sant Cugat, 08172 Barcelona, Spain)

Abstract

Material adverse change (MAC) clauses and contingent earnouts are important contractual mechanisms used to protect acquirers from the risk of adverse selection. Yet, the extant literature has not sufficiently explored the antecedents of their use, in particular within the context of technology acquisitions. In this study, we take advantage of the passage of the American Inventors Protection Act (AIPA), which disseminated information through the publication of patent applications, to explore the impact of innovation disclosures on the design of technology acquisition contracts. Consistent with the view that an increase in the availability of information related to the broader technological landscape reduces the need for contractual protections in acquisition contracts, our analysis demonstrates that deals disproportionately affected by AIPA have less expansive MAC clauses and are less likely to feature contingent earnouts. These results provide new evidence linking the use of MAC clauses and earnouts with acquisitions subject to information frictions.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeffrey J. Reuer & Sandip Bisui & George Chondrakis, 2025. "Innovation Disclosures and the Design of Technology Acquisition Contracts: Evidence from the American Inventors Protection Act," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(1), pages 68-92, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:orstsc:v:10:y:2025:i:1:p:68-92
    DOI: 10.1287/stsc.2022.0069
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/stsc.2022.0069
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/stsc.2022.0069?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orstsc:v:10:y:2025:i:1:p:68-92. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.