IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ororsc/v8y1997i5p489-507.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Ethical Superiority and Inevitability of Participatory Management as an Organizational System

Author

Listed:
  • Denis Collins

    (School of Business, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706)

Abstract

During the heady revolutionary days of the 1960s, Slater and Bennis (Slater, P. E., W. G. Bennis. 1964. Democracy is inevitable. Harvard Bus. Rev. 42 (2) 51--59.) declared the inevitability of democracy at the workplace. Twenty-five years later, in a retrospection of that article, the authors claimed that they were right (Slater and Bennis [Slater, P. E., W. G. Bennis. 1990. Democracy is inevitable. Harvard Bus. Rev. 68 (5) 167--176.]). Unfortunately, the data do not support their claim (Lawler et al. [Lawler, E. E., S. A. Mohrman, G. E. Ledford. 1992. Employee Involvement and Total Quality Management . Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco.]). Nonetheless, workplace democracy is inevitable.This article argues in favor of the inevitability of participatory management, one form of workplace democracy, on the basis of its coherence to the social philosophical assumptions about human nature that underlie the forms of political arrangements (democracy) and economic arrangements (mixed economy) in the United States. These communitarian philosophical assumptions have been thoroughly argued in the political science and economic literature to be ethically superior to other sets of social philosophical assumptions that underlie authoritarianism and libertarianism. Currently, organization theory is approximately 200 years behind this literature. Persons who experience significant benefits as a result of the central position of “liberty” in the social philosophical assumptions of democracy and capitalism tend to design organizational systems that significantly restrict the liberty of their employees.The current push for more democratic features is coming from organization theorists doing work on corporate culture, total quality management, gainsharing, and other systems of management that encourage decentralization, and from business ethics scholars doing work on the societal accountability of organizations. The very slow rate of evolution to workplace democracy is primarily attributed to the central role of the power elite. Whereas the American political and economic revolutionaries came from within the power elite of their times that is not yet the case for workplace democracy advocates.

Suggested Citation

  • Denis Collins, 1997. "The Ethical Superiority and Inevitability of Participatory Management as an Organizational System," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 8(5), pages 489-507, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:8:y:1997:i:5:p:489-507
    DOI: 10.1287/orsc.8.5.489
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.8.5.489
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/orsc.8.5.489?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yanhua Bird & Jodi L. Short & Michael W. Toffel, 2019. "Coupling Labor Codes of Conduct and Supplier Labor Practices: The Role of Internal Structural Conditions," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(4), pages 847-867, July.
    2. Jermias, Johnny & Setiawan, Trisnawati, 2008. "The moderating effects of hierarchy and control systems on the relationship between budgetary participation and performance," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 43(3), pages 268-292, September.
    3. David Rönnegard & N. Craig Smith, 2024. "A Rawlsian Rule for Corporate Governance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 190(2), pages 295-308, March.
    4. Saku Mantere & Eero Vaara, 2008. "On the Problem of Participation in Strategy: A Critical Discursive Perspective," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 19(2), pages 341-358, April.
    5. Drew, Stephen A. & Kelley, Patricia C. & Kendrick, Terry, 2006. "CLASS: Five elements of corporate governance to manage strategic risk," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 49(2), pages 127-138.
    6. A. Georges L. Romme, 2004. "Unanimity Rule and Organizational Decision Making: A Simulation Model," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(6), pages 704-718, December.
    7. repec:ilo:ilowps:453417 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Mathias Béjean & Sébastien Gand, 2010. "The odyssey of "alternative firms": new organizational propositions from a case-study," Post-Print hal-00708237, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:8:y:1997:i:5:p:489-507. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.