IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ororsc/v6y1995i1p32-43.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Organizational Environments and Organizational Discourse: Bureaucracy between Two Worlds

Author

Listed:
  • Heinz-Dieter Meyer

    (Center for Europe and North-America Research (CENS), Goettingen University, Humboldtallee 3, 37073 Goettingen, Germany)

Abstract

The controversy around Weber's theory of bureaucracy that occupied post-war American organization theorists serves as a backdrop to consider differences in the institutional and cultural environments of American and continental European, notably German, organizations. I suggest that formal organizations in the United States emerged under institutional and cultural conditions sufficiently different from those Weber witnessed as to account for the differences in the European and American organizational discourses. European institutional-cultural conditions favored a centralized, hierarchical, obedience-based organizational form with little uncertainty tolerance emphasizing loyalty. In the US, by contrast, the primacy of the large business organization which operated in volatile markets under the cultural imperative of equality favored flatter, less hierarchical, and more nearly decomposable organizations in which compliance was based on a temporary contract. Indifference vis-à-vis the national and cultural particulars of formal organizations may have led early organization research to prematurely close off a potentially fruitful line of inquiry in the field of comparative organization.

Suggested Citation

  • Heinz-Dieter Meyer, 1995. "Organizational Environments and Organizational Discourse: Bureaucracy between Two Worlds," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 6(1), pages 32-43, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:6:y:1995:i:1:p:32-43
    DOI: 10.1287/orsc.6.1.32
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.6.1.32
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/orsc.6.1.32?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tobin Im, 2014. "Bureaucracy in Three Different Worlds: The Assumptions of Failed Public Sector Reforms in Korea," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 577-596, December.
    2. Marjolijn S. Dijksterhuis & Frans A. J. Van den Bosch & Henk W. Volberda, 1999. "Where Do New Organizational Forms Come From? Management Logics as a Source of Coevolution," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(5), pages 569-582, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:6:y:1995:i:1:p:32-43. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.