IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ororsc/v5y1994i4p569-582.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the Wisdom of Rewarding A While Hoping for B

Author

Listed:
  • Richard D. Boettger

    (Department of Management, Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, Texas 76129)

  • Charles R. Greer

    (Department of Management, Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, Texas 76129)

Abstract

We explain the deeper organizational wisdom behind what Steven Kerr called the “folly” of seemingly inconsistent reward structures. Modern organizations—even those Kerr specifically criticizes as “fouled-up”—frequently need to serve two contradictory goals at the same time.Three conditions in particular require sophisticated organizations to reward A while nonetheless hoping for B. First, operative goals—e.g., for a police department—may require practical activities like “social work” that do not conform to the official culture of “crime fighting command bureaucracy.” Attempting to reward only these police activities which support the official goals would harm both the force and the citizens they serve. Second, times of great change—e.g., for environmental clean-up in Eastern Europe—require short-term inconsistencies such as supporting a highly polluting factory in order to accomplish long term ends. At one moment in time, a snapshot exposes a “foolish” inconsistency, but a long-term view reveals the wisdom of not attempting to treat complex problems with simple solutions. Third, some conditions of the real world will always require the individual to serve two masters, as in a classic matrix structure. Product and functional demands cannot be made perfectly consistent with each other, and to expect the organization to make them so is to wish for the impossible.Under the above conditions, it is better to teach individuals how to handle complex, inconsistent demands than it is to hold organizations responsible for eliminating them. While Kerr would work towards an organization in which “no one needs goodness,” we would hold our teaching and training systems responsible for making “goodness” and complexity part of the talent an individual brings to the organization. To put complexity and goodness beyond the individual and entirely in the province of the organization is to demand of the organization the impossible, and demean the human beings who are its substance and soul.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard D. Boettger & Charles R. Greer, 1994. "On the Wisdom of Rewarding A While Hoping for B," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 5(4), pages 569-582, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:5:y:1994:i:4:p:569-582
    DOI: 10.1287/orsc.5.4.569
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.4.569
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/orsc.5.4.569?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dobrow, Shoshana R. & Smith, Wendy K. & Posner, Michael A., 2011. "Managing the grading paradox: leveraging the power of choice in the classroom," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 59410, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Samuel Y. Todd & Tamara A. Crook & Tony Lachowetz, 2013. "Agency Theory Explanations of Self-Serving Sales Forecast Inaccuracies," Business and Management Research, Business and Management Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 2(2), pages 13-21, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:5:y:1994:i:4:p:569-582. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.