IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ororsc/v35y2024i5p1866-1889.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cognitive Economy and Product Categorization

Author

Listed:
  • Michele Piazzai

    (Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, 28903 Getafe, Spain)

  • Min Liu

    (Durham University, Durham DH1 3LB, United Kingdom)

  • Martina Montauti

    (University of St. Gallen, CH-9000 St. Gallen, Switzerland)

Abstract

In mediated markets, the categorization of products by mediators is critical to efficient interaction between producers and consumers. As organizational research tends to focus on the consequences of categorization rather than its antecedents, however, we know relatively little about why mediators assign one category label or another to a product. In this study, we argue that two informational properties of labels, specificity and distinctiveness , determine the outcomes of mediators’ categorization decisions. Our analysis of product categorization decisions made by members of an online music community, 2000–2020, supports this argument. We find that a label’s odds of being assigned to a product increase (a) if this label encodes information that is neither too similar nor too different from that which is encoded by a superordinate label, that is, it has moderate specificity; and (b) if it encodes information that differs as much as possible from that which is encoded by horizontally related labels, that is, it has maximal distinctiveness. These findings persist after controlling for other possible determinants of mediators’ categorization decisions, including producers’ claims to labels, products’ typicality, and mediators’ expertise.

Suggested Citation

  • Michele Piazzai & Min Liu & Martina Montauti, 2024. "Cognitive Economy and Product Categorization," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(5), pages 1866-1889, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:35:y:2024:i:5:p:1866-1889
    DOI: 10.1287/orsc.2021.15751
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2021.15751
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/orsc.2021.15751?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:35:y:2024:i:5:p:1866-1889. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.