IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ororsc/v35y2024i4p1203-1223.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bribery in the Workplace: A Field Experiment on the Threat of Making Group Behavior Visible

Author

Listed:
  • Diana Dakhlallah

    (Organizational Behavior, Desautels Faculty of Management, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 1G5, Canada)

Abstract

Can reputational threat among coworkers reduce bribery in organizations? I exploit within- and across-organizational variation in bribery to design and implement a field experiment in the maternity wards of five Moroccan public hospitals. I test whether threatening to reveal information about ward workers’ involvement in bribery to their coworkers dissuades them from taking bribes from patients. Healthcare workers cut back on taking bribes in higher-incidence maternity wards but not in lower-incidence wards. Qualitative data show that bribery’s baseline incidence sets the costs of revealing. Workers tolerate only so much bribery in their wards before they face the negative social consequences of belonging to a work group that takes bribes. They thus correct their behavior when it crosses a threshold. Moreover, ineffective applications of the field interventions betrayed welfare-diminishing effects. I furnish evidence for a novel kind of policy lever against workplace bribery and shed new light on the dynamics of bribery inside organizations.

Suggested Citation

  • Diana Dakhlallah, 2024. "Bribery in the Workplace: A Field Experiment on the Threat of Making Group Behavior Visible," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(4), pages 1203-1223, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:35:y:2024:i:4:p:1203-1223
    DOI: 10.1287/orsc.2021.15264
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2021.15264
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/orsc.2021.15264?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:35:y:2024:i:4:p:1203-1223. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.