IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ororsc/v34y2023i3p1073-1089.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Wisdom in the Wild: Generalization and Adaptive Dynamics

Author

Listed:
  • Jaeho Choi

    (Management Department, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104)

  • Daniel Levinthal

    (Management Department, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104)

Abstract

Learning from experience is a central mechanism underlying organizational capabilities. However, in examining how organizations learn from past experiences, much of the literature has focused on situations in which actors are facing a repeated event. We direct attention to a relatively underexamined question: when an organization experiences a largely idiosyncratic series of events, at what level of granularity should these events, and the associated actions and outcomes, be encoded? How does generalizing from experience impact the wisdom of future choices and what are the boundary conditions or factors that might mitigate the degree of desired generalization? To address these questions, we develop a computational model that incorporates how characteristics of opportunities (e.g., acquisition candidates, new investments, product development) might be encoded so that experiential learning is possible even when the organization’s experience is a series of unique events. Our results highlight the power of learning through generalization in a world of novelty as well as the features of the problem environment that reduce this “power.”

Suggested Citation

  • Jaeho Choi & Daniel Levinthal, 2023. "Wisdom in the Wild: Generalization and Adaptive Dynamics," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(3), pages 1073-1089, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:34:y:2023:i:3:p:1073-1089
    DOI: 10.1287/orsc.2022.1609
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2022.1609
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/orsc.2022.1609?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:34:y:2023:i:3:p:1073-1089. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.