IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ororsc/v15y2004i3p349-349.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Introduction to the “Corporate Objective Revisited” Exchange

Author

Listed:
  • James P. Walsh

    (University of Michigan)

Abstract

Corporate scandals and abuses of various kinds grab the headlines. Reform initiatives quickly follow outrage. The goal is to constrain our firms' ability to destroy value and lives, while at the same time enabling them to produce and deliver high-quality and profitable goods and services in a very competitive global marketplace. Less obvious but no less important, civil society is increasingly asking corporations to invest directly in social life. Regardless of their productive capabilities, firms can field requests to invest in education, health care, infrastructure, and the like. Sometimes the two ambitions seem to be quite compatible, while at other times they seem to be at odds. Leading a business that is at once socially responsive and economically competitive is a daunting managerial challenge. The theoretical challenge posed by these sometimes competing and sometimes complementary demands is no less daunting.Since the rise of the first corporations two thousand years ago, we have been trying to develop a theory of the firm that explains and guides firm behavior. Sundaram and Inkpen enter this complex and charged world to make a case for a theory of the firm grounded in the pursuit of shareholder wealth. Freeman, Wicks, and Parmar will not let their view go unchallenged. They offer a spirited reply. The exchange embodies everything our Crossroads section can be. We are proud to provide a home for this very thoughtful exchange. This is arguably the most important theoretical and practical issue confronting us today. While we gave Sundaram and Inkpen the last word, we know that the debate is far from over. Indeed, we invite others to think hard about these issues and develop their own point of view. The stakes are enormous.

Suggested Citation

  • James P. Walsh, 2004. "Introduction to the “Corporate Objective Revisited” Exchange," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(3), pages 349-349, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:15:y:2004:i:3:p:349-349
    DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1040.0086
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0086
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/orsc.1040.0086?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Regina F. Bento & Lasse Mertins & Lourdes F. White, 2017. "Ideology and the Balanced Scorecard: An Empirical Exploration of the Tension Between Shareholder Value Maximization and Corporate Social Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 142(4), pages 769-789, June.
    2. Bidhan L. Parmar & Adrian Keevil & Andrew C. Wicks, 2019. "People and Profits: The Impact of Corporate Objectives on Employees’ Need Satisfaction at Work," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 154(1), pages 13-33, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:15:y:2004:i:3:p:349-349. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.