IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/oropre/v73y2025i2p798-818.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stochastic Online Fisher Markets: Static Pricing Limits and Adaptive Enhancements

Author

Listed:
  • Devansh Jalota

    (Institute for Computational and Mathematical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305)

  • Yinyu Ye

    (Department of Management Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305)

Abstract

Fisher markets are one of the most fundamental models for resource allocation. However, the problem of computing equilibrium prices in Fisher markets typically relies on complete knowledge of users’ budgets and utility functions and requires transactions to happen in a static market where all users are present simultaneously. Motivated by these practical considerations, we study an online variant of Fisher markets, wherein users with privately known utility and budget parameters, drawn independently and identically (i.i.d.) from a distribution, arrive sequentially. In this setting, we first study the limitations of static pricing algorithms, which set uniform prices for all users, along two performance metrics: (i) regret, that is, the optimality gap in the objective of the Eisenberg-Gale program between an online algorithm and an oracle with complete information, and (ii) capacity violations, that is, the overconsumption of goods relative to their capacities. Given the limitations of static pricing, we design adaptive posted-pricing algorithms, one with knowledge of the distribution of users’ budget and utility parameters and another that adjusts prices solely based on past observations of user consumption, that is, revealed preference feedback, with improved performance guarantees. Finally, we present numerical experiments to compare our revealed preference algorithm’s performance to several benchmarks.

Suggested Citation

  • Devansh Jalota & Yinyu Ye, 2025. "Stochastic Online Fisher Markets: Static Pricing Limits and Adaptive Enhancements," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 73(2), pages 798-818, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:73:y:2025:i:2:p:798-818
    DOI: 10.1287/opre.2023.0636
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.2023.0636
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/opre.2023.0636?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:73:y:2025:i:2:p:798-818. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.