IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/oropre/v72y2024i6p2413-2429.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal Auction Design with Deferred Inspection and Reward

Author

Listed:
  • Saeed Alaei

    (Google Research, Mountain View, California 94043)

  • Alexandre Belloni

    (Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708; Amazon, WW FBA, North Carolina)

  • Ali Makhdoumi

    (Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708)

  • Azarakhsh Malekian

    (Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3E6, Canada)

Abstract

Consider a mechanism run by an auctioneer who can use both payment and inspection instruments to incentivize agents. The timeline of the events is as follows. Based on a prespecified allocation rule and the reported values of agents, the auctioneer allocates the item and secures the reported values as deposits. The auctioneer then inspects the values of agents and, using a prespecified reward rule, rewards the ones who have reported truthfully. Using techniques from convex analysis and calculus of variations, for any distribution of values, we fully characterize the optimal mechanism for a single agent. Using Border’s theorem and duality, we find conditions under which our characterization extends to multiple agents. Interestingly, the optimal allocation function, unlike the classic settings without inspection, is not a threshold strategy and instead is an increasing and continuous function of the types. We also present an implementation of our optimal auction and show that it achieves a higher revenue than auctions in classic settings without inspection. This is because the inspection enables the auctioneer to charge payments closer to the agents’ true values without creating incentives for them to deviate to lower types.

Suggested Citation

  • Saeed Alaei & Alexandre Belloni & Ali Makhdoumi & Azarakhsh Malekian, 2024. "Optimal Auction Design with Deferred Inspection and Reward," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 72(6), pages 2413-2429, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:72:y:2024:i:6:p:2413-2429
    DOI: 10.1287/opre.2020.0651
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.2020.0651
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/opre.2020.0651?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:72:y:2024:i:6:p:2413-2429. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.