IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/oropre/v72y2024i3p1192-1202.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integer Factorization: Why Two-Item Joint Replenishment Is Hard

Author

Listed:
  • Andreas S. Schulz

    (Department of Mathematics and School of Management, Technische Universität München, 80333 München, Germany)

  • Claudio Telha

    (Facultad de Ingeniería y Ciencias Aplicadas, Universidad de los Andes, Santiago de Chile 9000000, Chile)

Abstract

Distribution networks with periodically repeating events often hold great promise to exploit economies of scale. Joint replenishment problems are fundamental in inventory management, manufacturing, and logistics and capture these effects. However, finding an efficient algorithm that optimally solves these models or showing that none may exist have long been open regardless of whether empty joint orders are possible or not. In either case, we show that finding optimal solutions to joint replenishment instances with just two items is at least as difficult as integer factorization. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first time integer factorization is used to explain the computational hardness of any optimization problem. We can even prove that the two-item joint replenishment problem with possibly empty joint-ordering points is NP-complete under randomized reductions. This implies that even quantum computers may not be able to solve it efficiently. By relating the computational complexity of joint replenishment to cryptography, prime decomposition, and other aspects of prime numbers, a similar approach may help to establish the (integer-factorization) hardness of additional periodic problems in supply chain management and beyond, whose computational complexity has not been resolved yet.

Suggested Citation

  • Andreas S. Schulz & Claudio Telha, 2024. "Integer Factorization: Why Two-Item Joint Replenishment Is Hard," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 72(3), pages 1192-1202, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:72:y:2024:i:3:p:1192-1202
    DOI: 10.1287/opre.2022.2390
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.2022.2390
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/opre.2022.2390?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:72:y:2024:i:3:p:1192-1202. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.