Author
Listed:
- Srikanth Jagabathula
(Leonard N. Stern School of Business, New York University, New York, New York 10012)
- Dmitry Mitrofanov
(Carroll School of Management, Boston College, Chesnut Hill, Massachusetts 02467)
- Gustavo Vulcano
(School of Business, Universidad Torcuato Di Tella, Buenos Aires 1428, Argentina; Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Buenos Aires 1428, Argentina)
Abstract
To estimate customer demand, choice models rely both on what the individuals do and do not purchase. A customer may not purchase a product because it was not offered but also because it was not considered. To account for this behavior, existing literature has proposed the so-called consider-then-choose (CTC) models, which posit that customers sample a consideration set and then choose the most preferred product from the intersection of the offer set and the consideration set. CTC models have been studied quite extensively in the marketing literature. More recently, they have gained popularity within the operations management (OM) literature to make assortment and pricing decisions. Despite their richness, CTC models are difficult to estimate in practice because firms typically do not observe customers’ consideration sets. Therefore, the common assumption in OM has been that customers consider everything on offer, so the consideration set is the same as the offer set. This raises the following question: When firms only collect transaction data, do CTC models provide any predictive advantage over classic choice models? More precisely, under what conditions do CTC models outperform (if ever) classic choice models in terms of prediction accuracy? In this work, we study a general class of CTC models. We propose techniques to estimate these models efficiently from sales transaction data. We then compare their performance against the classic approach. We find that CTC models outperform standard choice models when there is noise in the offer set information and the noise is asymmetric across the training and test offer sets but otherwise lead to no particular predictive advantage over the classic approach. We also demonstrate the benefits of using CTC models in real-world retail settings. In particular, we show that CTC models calibrated on retail transaction data are better at long-term and warehouse level sales forecasts. We also evaluate their performance in the context of an online platform setting: a peer-to-peer car sharing company. In this context, offer sets are even difficult to define. We observe a remarkable performance of CTC models over standard choice models therein.
Suggested Citation
Srikanth Jagabathula & Dmitry Mitrofanov & Gustavo Vulcano, 2024.
"Demand Estimation Under Uncertain Consideration Sets,"
Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 72(1), pages 19-42, January.
Handle:
RePEc:inm:oropre:v:72:y:2024:i:1:p:19-42
DOI: 10.1287/opre.2022.0006
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:72:y:2024:i:1:p:19-42. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.