IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/oropre/v71y2023i5p1777-1788.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tight Guarantees for Static Threshold Policies in the Prophet Secretary Problem

Author

Listed:
  • Nick Arnosti

    (Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455)

  • Will Ma

    (Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027)

Abstract

In the prophet secretary problem, n values are drawn independently from known distributions and presented in a uniformly random order. A decision maker must accept or reject each value when it is presented and may accept at most k values in total. The objective is to maximize the expected sum of accepted values. We analyze the performance of static threshold policies , which accept the first k values exceeding a fixed threshold (or all such values, if fewer than k exist). We show that an appropriate threshold guarantees γ k = 1 − e − k k k / k ! times the value of the offline optimal solution. Note that γ 1 = 1 − 1 / e , and by Stirling’s approximation, γ k ≈ 1 − 1 / 2 π k . This represents the best-known guarantee for the prophet secretary problem for all k > 1 and is tight for all k for the class of static threshold policies. We provide two simple methods for setting the threshold. Our first method sets a threshold such that k · γ k values are accepted in expectation, and offers an optimal guarantee for all k . Our second sets a threshold such that the expected number of values exceeding the threshold is equal to k . This approach gives an optimal guarantee if k > 4 but gives suboptimal guarantees for k ≤ 4 . Our proofs use a new result for optimizing sums of independent Bernoulli random variables, which extends a result of Hoeffding from 1956 and could be of independent interest.

Suggested Citation

  • Nick Arnosti & Will Ma, 2023. "Tight Guarantees for Static Threshold Policies in the Prophet Secretary Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 71(5), pages 1777-1788, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:71:y:2023:i:5:p:1777-1788
    DOI: 10.1287/opre.2022.2419
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.2022.2419
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/opre.2022.2419?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:71:y:2023:i:5:p:1777-1788. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.