Author
Listed:
- Xue Dong He
(Department of Systems Engineering and Engineering Management, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong)
- Moris S. Strub
(Department of Information Systems and Management Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518055, China; Institute of Risk Analysis, Prediction, and Management, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518055, China)
Abstract
We study the implications of various models of partially endogenous reference point formation on optimal decision making in the context of portfolio optimization under loss aversion. Specifically, we first consider the partially endogenous model of De Giorgi and Post [ Management Science (2011) 57(6):1094–1110], where the reference point is determined in equilibrium but contains an exogenous component. We find that optimal trading behavior is as if the reference point were completely exogenous and that allowing for a mental adjustment of the reference point solely manifests itself in a lower degree of loss aversion. We then propose two novel models of partially endogenous reference point formation: A model of a reference point determined by optimal expectations and a model of mental reference point updating. Our conclusions on the effect of a partially endogenized reference point on portfolio selection under loss aversion are also confirmed under these two models. These findings suggest that it is difficult to separately identify an agent’s degree of loss aversion and his or her reference point and may help to explain why experienced and sophisticated agents appear to be less loss averse than expected in some field settings. Our models also predict that displays of loss aversion are decreasing in the duration an agent is given to contemplate a decision.
Suggested Citation
Xue Dong He & Moris S. Strub, 2022.
"How Endogenization of the Reference Point Affects Loss Aversion: A Study of Portfolio Selection,"
Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 70(6), pages 3035-3053, November.
Handle:
RePEc:inm:oropre:v:70:y:2022:i:6:p:3035-3053
DOI: 10.1287/opre.2022.2309
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:70:y:2022:i:6:p:3035-3053. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.