Author
Listed:
- Itai Ashlagi
(Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305)
- Anilesh K. Krishnaswamy
(Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708)
- Rahul Makhijani
(Facebook, Menlo Park, California 94025)
- Daniela Saban
(Stanford Graduate School of Business, Stanford, California 94305)
- Kirankumar Shiragur
(Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305)
Abstract
Two-sided matching platforms provide users with menus of match recommendations. To maximize the number of realized matches between the two sides (referred to herein as customers and suppliers), the platform must balance the inherent tension between recommending more suppliers to customers to increase the chances that they like one of them and avoiding the conflicts that arise when customers, who are given more options, end up choosing the same suppliers. We introduce a stylized model to study the above tradeoff. The platform offers each customer a menu of suppliers, and customers choose, simultaneously and independently, to either select a supplier from their menu or remain unmatched. Suppliers then see the set of customers that have selected them and choose to either match with one of these customers or remain unmatched. A match occurs if a customer and a supplier choose each other (in sequence). Agents’ choices are probabilistic and proportional to the public scores of agents in their menu and a score that is associated with the outside option of remaining unmatched. The platform’s problem is to construct menus for customers, so as to maximize the total number of matches. We first show that this problem is strongly NP-hard. Then, we provide an intuitive efficient algorithm that achieves a constant-factor approximation to the optimal expected number of matches. Our algorithm uses bucketing (grouping similar suppliers into buckets) together with linear-programming-based relaxations and rounding techniques.
Suggested Citation
Itai Ashlagi & Anilesh K. Krishnaswamy & Rahul Makhijani & Daniela Saban & Kirankumar Shiragur, 2022.
"Technical Note—Assortment Planning for Two-Sided Sequential Matching Markets,"
Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 70(5), pages 2784-2803, September.
Handle:
RePEc:inm:oropre:v:70:y:2022:i:5:p:2784-2803
DOI: 10.1287/opre.2022.2327
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:70:y:2022:i:5:p:2784-2803. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.