IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/oropre/v70y2022i3p1410-1427.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Strategic Benefit of Request for Proposal/Quotation

Author

Listed:
  • Leon Yang Chu

    (Marshall School of Business, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089; Cheung Kong Graduate School of Business, 201107 Shanghai, China)

  • Ying Rong

    (Antai College of Economics and Management, Shanghai Jiaotong University, 200052 Shanghai, China)

  • Huan Zheng

    (Antai College of Economics and Management, Shanghai Jiaotong University, 200052 Shanghai, China)

Abstract

We study how the procurement process may help a buyer reduce purchasing costs under a dual-sourcing setting. First, we analyze the equilibrium outcomes when the buyer simultaneously or sequentially bilaterally negotiates with the suppliers. We establish coordination results and characterize the buyer’s maximum equilibrium profit under such bilateral bargaining settings. Moreover, we show that the buyer can benefit from a request for proposal/quotation (RFx) stage that precedes the negotiation stage when the suppliers are imperfect substitutes. Specifically, by endogenizing the sequence of negotiations via the offers tendered in the RFx stage, the buyer’s equilibrium profit with an RFx is (weakly) higher than his or her maximum equilibrium profit without an RFx. Furthermore, under a complete information setting, the buyer accepts both offers generated in the RFx stage and additional negotiation needs not to be carried out in equilibrium. Our insights extend to a random demand setting, in which the buyer first negotiates contracts with the suppliers and then decides order quantities after demand realization.

Suggested Citation

  • Leon Yang Chu & Ying Rong & Huan Zheng, 2022. "The Strategic Benefit of Request for Proposal/Quotation," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 70(3), pages 1410-1427, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:70:y:2022:i:3:p:1410-1427
    DOI: 10.1287/opre.2019.1964
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.2019.1964
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/opre.2019.1964?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:70:y:2022:i:3:p:1410-1427. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.