Author
Listed:
- Rad Niazadeh
(Chicago Booth School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637)
- Jason Hartline
(Computer Science Department, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208)
- Nicole Immorlica
(Microsoft Research New England, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142)
- Mohammad Reza Khani
(Amazon, Seattle, Washington 98109)
- Brendan Lucier
(Microsoft Research New England, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142)
Abstract
Standard ad auction formats do not immediately extend to settings where multiple size configurations and layouts are available to advertisers. In these settings, the sale of web advertising space increasingly resembles a combinatorial auction with complementarities, where truthful auctions such as the Vickrey–Clarke–Groves (VCG) auction can yield unacceptably low revenue. We therefore study core-selecting auctions, which boost revenue by setting payments so that no group of agents, including the auctioneer, can jointly improve their utilities by switching to a different outcome. Our main result is a combinatorial algorithm that finds an approximate bidder-optimal core point with an almost linear number of calls to the welfare-maximization oracle. Our algorithm is faster than previously proposed heuristics in the literature and has theoretical guarantees. We conclude that core pricing is implementable even for very time-sensitive practical use cases such as real-time auctions for online advertising and can yield more revenue. We justify this claim experimentally usingMicrosoft Bing Ad Auction data, through which we show our core pricing algorithm generates almost 26% more revenue than the VCG auction on average, about 9% more revenue than other core pricing rules known in the literature, and almost matches the revenue of the standard generalized second price auction.
Suggested Citation
Rad Niazadeh & Jason Hartline & Nicole Immorlica & Mohammad Reza Khani & Brendan Lucier, 2022.
"Fast Core Pricing for Rich Advertising Auctions,"
Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 70(1), pages 223-240, January.
Handle:
RePEc:inm:oropre:v:70:y:2022:i:1:p:223-240
DOI: 10.1287/opre.2021.2104
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:70:y:2022:i:1:p:223-240. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.