IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/oropre/v70y2022i1p111-128.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

1.79-Approximation Algorithms for Continuous Review Single-Sourcing Lost-Sales and Dual-Sourcing Inventory Models

Author

Listed:
  • Linwei Xin

    (Booth School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637)

Abstract

Stochastic inventory systems with lead times are often challenging to optimize, including single-sourcing lost-sales and dual-sourcing inventory systems. Recent numerical results suggest that capped policies demonstrate superior performance over existing heuristics. However, the superior performance lacks a theoretical foundation, and why such policies generally perform so well remains a major open question. In this paper, we provide a theoretical foundation for this phenomenon in two classical inventory models with lead times. First, in a continuous-review lost-sales inventory model with lead times and Poisson demand, we prove that a so-called capped base-stock policy has a worst-case performance guarantee of 1.79 by conducting an asymptotic analysis under a large penalty cost and lead time. Second, we extend the analysis to a more complex continuous-review dual-sourcing inventory model with general lead times and Poisson demand and also prove that a so-called capped dual-index policy has a worst-case performance guarantee of 1.79 under large lead time and ordering cost differences. Our results provide a deeper understanding of the superior numerical performance of capped policies and present a new approach to proving worst-case performance guarantees of simple policies in hard inventory problems.

Suggested Citation

  • Linwei Xin, 2022. "1.79-Approximation Algorithms for Continuous Review Single-Sourcing Lost-Sales and Dual-Sourcing Inventory Models," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 70(1), pages 111-128, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:70:y:2022:i:1:p:111-128
    DOI: 10.1287/opre.2021.2150
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.2021.2150
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/opre.2021.2150?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:70:y:2022:i:1:p:111-128. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.