IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/oropre/v64y2016i4p794-821.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Combining Spot and Futures Markets: A Hybrid Market Approach to Dynamic Spectrum Access

Author

Listed:
  • Lin Gao

    (School of Electronic and Information Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology (Shenzhen), Shenzhen 518055, China; and Department of Management Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong)

  • Biying Shou

    (Department of Management Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong)

  • Ying-Ju Chen

    (School of Business and Management and School of Engineering, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong)

  • Jianwei Huang

    (Department of Information Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, NT, Hong Kong)

Abstract

Dynamic spectrum access is a new paradigm of secondary spectrum utilization and sharing. It allows unlicensed secondary users (SUs) to exploit the opportunistically underutilized licensed spectrum. Market mechanism is a widely used promising means to regulate the consuming behaviours of users and, hence, achieve the efficient allocation and consumption of limited resources. In this paper, we propose and study a hybrid secondary spectrum market consisting of both the futures market and the spot market , in which SUs (buyers) purchase underutilized licensed spectrum from a spectrum regulator (SR), either through predefined contracts via the futures market, or through spot transactions via the spot market. We focus on the optimal spectrum allocation among SUs in an exogenous hybrid market that maximizes the secondary spectrum utilization efficiency. The problem is challenging because of the stochasticity and asymmetry of network information. To solve this problem, we first derive an off-line optimal allocation policy that maximizes the ex ante expected spectrum utilization efficiency based on the stochastic distribution of network information. We then propose an online Vickrey-Clarke-Groves (VCG) auction that determines the real-time allocation and pricing of every spectrum based on the realized network information and the prederived off-line policy. We further show that with the spatial frequency reuse, the proposed VCG auction is NP-hard; hence, it is not suitable for online implementation, especially in a large-scale market. To this end, we propose a heuristics approach based on an online VCG-like mechanism with polynomial-time complexity, and further characterize the corresponding performance loss bound analytically. We finally provide extensive numerical results to evaluate the performance of the proposed solutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Lin Gao & Biying Shou & Ying-Ju Chen & Jianwei Huang, 2016. "Combining Spot and Futures Markets: A Hybrid Market Approach to Dynamic Spectrum Access," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 64(4), pages 794-821, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:64:y:2016:i:4:p:794-821
    DOI: 10.1287/opre.2016.1507
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.2016.1507
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/opre.2016.1507?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nisan,Noam & Roughgarden,Tim & Tardos,Eva & Vazirani,Vijay V. (ed.), 2007. "Algorithmic Game Theory," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521872829, October.
    2. Paul R. Kleindorfer & D. J. Wu, 2003. "Integrating Long- and Short-Term Contracting via Business-to-Business Exchanges for Capital-Intensive Industries," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(11), pages 1597-1615, November.
    3. D. J. Wu & Paul R. Kleindorfer, 2005. "Competitive Options, Supply Contracting, and Electronic Markets," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(3), pages 452-466, March.
    4. Panos Kouvelis & Rong Li & Qing Ding, 2013. "Managing Storable Commodity Risks: The Role of Inventory and Financial Hedge," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 15(3), pages 507-521, July.
    5. Roger B. Myerson, 1981. "Optimal Auction Design," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 6(1), pages 58-73, February.
    6. Hau Lee & Seungjin Whang, 2002. "The Impact of the Secondary Market on the Supply Chain," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(6), pages 719-731, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xing, Wei & Liu, Liming & Wang, Shouyang, 2014. "More than a second channel? Supply chain strategies in B2B spot markets," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(3), pages 699-710.
    2. Pamela Pen-Erh Pei & David Simchi-Levi & Tunay I. Tunca, 2011. "Sourcing Flexibility, Spot Trading, and Procurement Contract Structure," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(3), pages 578-601, June.
    3. Onur Boyabatlı, 2015. "Supply Management in Multiproduct Firms with Fixed Proportions Technology," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(12), pages 3013-3031, December.
    4. Panos Kouvelis & Rong Li & Qing Ding, 2013. "Managing Storable Commodity Risks: The Role of Inventory and Financial Hedge," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 15(3), pages 507-521, July.
    5. Joseph M. Milner & Panos Kouvelis, 2007. "Inventory, Speculation, and Sourcing Strategies in the Presence of Online Exchanges," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 9(3), pages 312-331, July.
    6. Xu, Jinpeng & Feng, Gengzhong & Jiang, Wei & Wang, Shouyang, 2015. "Optimal procurement of long-term contracts in the presence of imperfect spot market," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 42-52.
    7. Dana G. Popescu & Sridhar Seshadri, 2013. "Demand Uncertainty and Excess Supply in Commodity Contracting," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(9), pages 2135-2152, September.
    8. D. J. Wu & Paul R. Kleindorfer, 2005. "Competitive Options, Supply Contracting, and Electronic Markets," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(3), pages 452-466, March.
    9. Tunay I. Tunca & Qiong Wu, 2009. "Multiple Sourcing and Procurement Process Selection with Bidding Events," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(5), pages 763-780, May.
    10. Chong Wang & Xu Chen, 2017. "Option pricing and coordination in the fresh produce supply chain with portfolio contracts," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 248(1), pages 471-491, January.
    11. Ahlert, Klaus-Henning & Corsten, Hans & Gössinger, Ralf, 2009. "Capacity management in order-driven production networks--A flexibility-oriented approach to determine the size of a network capacity pool," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(2), pages 430-441, April.
    12. Ruina Yang & Lijun Ma, 2017. "Two-part tariff contracting with competing unreliable suppliers in a supply chain under asymmetric information," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 257(1), pages 559-585, October.
    13. Wei Xing & Shanshan Ma & Xuan Zhao & Liming Liu, 2022. "Operational hedging or financial hedging? Strategic risk management in commodity procurement," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(8), pages 3233-3263, August.
    14. Amar Sapra & Peter L. Jackson, 2022. "Integration of long‐ and short‐term contracts in a market for capacity," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(7), pages 2872-2890, July.
    15. Fangruo Chen, 2007. "Auctioning Supply Contracts," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(10), pages 1562-1576, October.
    16. Sillanpää, Ville & Liesiö, Juuso & Käki, Anssi, 2021. "Procurement decisions over multiple periods under piecewise-linear shortage costs and fixed capacity commitments," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    17. Gärttner, Johannes & Flath, Christoph M. & Weinhardt, Christof, 2018. "Portfolio and contract design for demand response resources," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(1), pages 340-353.
    18. Martinez de Albeniz, Victor & Simchi-Levi, David, 2007. "Competition in the supply option market," IESE Research Papers D/718, IESE Business School.
    19. G. Anandalingam & Robert W. Day & S. Raghavan, 2005. "The Landscape of Electronic Market Design," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(3), pages 316-327, March.
    20. Tunay I. Tunca & Stefanos A. Zenios, 2006. "Supply Auctions and Relational Contracts for Procurement," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 8(1), pages 43-67, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:64:y:2016:i:4:p:794-821. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.