IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/oropre/v5y1957i5p680-692.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Minimum Cost Decision-Feedback Systems for Detecting Signals Perturbed by Additive Gaussian Noise

Author

Listed:
  • B. Harris

    (College of Engineering, New York University, New York, New York)

  • A. Hauptschein

    (College of Engineering, New York University, New York, New York)

  • L. S. Schwartz

    (College of Engineering, New York University, New York, New York)

Abstract

This paper is concerned with achieving reliable communications at minimum cost. It studies a means of accomplishing this in the form of a decision-feedback system. In this system binary signals are transmitted and three decisions are permitted at the receiver (1) the decision to record the presence of a signal, (2) the decision to record the absence of a signal, and (3) the decision to withhold recording a statement about the signal. Because of noise, the first decision may result in a false alarm and the second in a miss. By withholding judgment in doubtful cases, the risk of a wrong decision may be reduced providing two conditions are met (1) natural (i.e., language) or artificial (i.e., coding) constraints can be utilized within the message to interpret doubtful observations and/or (2) the transmitter can be required to repeat the signal corresponding to the doubtful observation. The latter is the method of decision feedback. The objectives of this paper are two-fold (1) to develop a theory of decision-feedback systems by means of which the optimum conditions of operation in the least cost sense can be specified and (2) to demonstrate that the method of artificial constraints for interpreting doubtful observations is less efficient in its use of the fundamental communication cost parameters, power, bandwidth, and time than decision feedback.

Suggested Citation

  • B. Harris & A. Hauptschein & L. S. Schwartz, 1957. "Minimum Cost Decision-Feedback Systems for Detecting Signals Perturbed by Additive Gaussian Noise," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 5(5), pages 680-692, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:5:y:1957:i:5:p:680-692
    DOI: 10.1287/opre.5.5.680
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.5.5.680
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/opre.5.5.680?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:5:y:1957:i:5:p:680-692. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.